I give it 10 years that AI replaces 80% of all the jobs out there

[Cyber2B]

Betting that 10 years from now 80% of the job are taken by AI.

The exponential graph that nobody is understanding is immense. there is no technological advancements in history that is rising faster than AI.

Hey if you see this post in 10 years and I happen to be wrong feel free to drop your paypal or venmo and I'll buy you a beer.

[HypersleepyNaputunia]

Will it be running man gameshow but for jobs. Winner gets to work

[✡︎sprut✡(they/them)✡.il]

Luddites in Yorkshire, 1816

"I give it 10 years that loom replaces 80% of all the textile jobs out there"

point is, new technology makes labour more efficient. As the menial jobs become automated we'll be free to explore new opportunities and advance technology (an by extension our quality of life) further

[Xero_Daxter]

Good. Now only Karens can complain to AI.

[skOsH♥]

AI currently doesn't understand search engine queries when it comes to basic questions

But it can doctor a video to make someone look like they did something they didn't.

What a cool future

All new technology always has military application first. So...that's what it will be used for, and that's why it was originally developed

[Crystal Sharrd]

AI is both incompetent and built upon death. It's also energy-intensive and environmentally-unfriendly. I doubt it will last that longer.

[steven1mac]

Hollywood has ran out of ideas, so it will be hard to tell the difference between modern and AI drivel.

[ナルゴ]

AI is not going to knock on your door, go into your basement, assess your plumbing situation, propose a solution to whatever problem is found, and then actually fix it.

With critical tasks or jobs that require expert field knowledge, you will still need an actual human.
Not only for making sure that the job is done competently, but to ensure that someone is liable if something fails. Corporate can always point the finger to specific individuals, rather than come up with the terrible excuse that they used the wrong machine learning models. Because if there's anything that executives don't like, it's taking responsibility.

[smokerob79]

Nargo님이 먼저 게시:

AI is not going to knock on your door, go into your basement, assess your plumbing situation, propose a solution to whatever problem is found, and then actually fix it.

With critical tasks or jobs that require expert field knowledge, you will still need an actual human.
Not only for making sure that the job is done competently, but to ensure that someone is liable if something fails. Corporate can always point the finger to specific individuals, rather than come up with the terrible excuse that they used the wrong machine learning models. Because if there's anything that executives don't like, it's taking responsibility.

you think white people do these things......HAHAHAHAHA

[Coinkydink]

AI is BS that can only replace BS computer-based jobs

[AdahnGorion]

AI can't replace my role

[xAlphaStarOmegax]

Well I give it 5 years.

[C4Warr10r]

I'd bet that in one year, humans invent 80% more jobs than AI can take in ten. As it is, we have MUCH more advanced AI than the junk people are worried about, like Chatbots and Artbots. It's just popular too be worried now because people speak, and people make art, so they get the impression that AI is replacing us. Yet we don't have fewer jobs.

Instead, we have a lot more technical jobs, and newer jobs created by the prosperity generated. Everyone here should be acutely aware of that, given that we're on an electronic gaming platform. Is gaming productive? Not in the usual sense, but it's a multi-billion-dollar industry regardless. The gaming industry alone is larger than the auto industry was in 1929, adjusted for inflation. See? Where people don't have jobs, they just make up new ones.

Gaming is a radical example, though. Usually, AI, or any technology, just augments work, and then there are whole industries devoted to out-innovating those augments, or making different ones, or countering them, etc. There's basically no stopping human creativity and industry unless you de-incentivize it.

I hate that I'm always the guy who brings up Communism, but it's a good example of people destroying work inadvertently. Even in a society designed to promote work and workers, they royally screwed that up by trying to impose centralized planning and control. If they had just left people alone, their economies actually would have worked, like others did.

Point is, you're likely to a lot more damage to work than you are to promote it if you attempt to limit AI. It's just not capable of replacing human work on every level. Not yet, and maybe never. If it ever does and we decide that's a bad thing, we have weapons to destroy it. So far, there's nothing an AI has ever thought of that humans didn't think of first.

[steven1mac]

For most task, a person is cheaper than a machine. They are cheaper to replace than a machine.

[Boblin the Goblin]

smokerob79님이 먼저 게시:

Nargo님이 먼저 게시:

AI is not going to knock on your door, go into your basement, assess your plumbing situation, propose a solution to whatever problem is found, and then actually fix it.

With critical tasks or jobs that require expert field knowledge, you will still need an actual human.
Not only for making sure that the job is done competently, but to ensure that someone is liable if something fails. Corporate can always point the finger to specific individuals, rather than come up with the terrible excuse that they used the wrong machine learning models. Because if there's anything that executives don't like, it's taking responsibility.

you think white people do these things......HAHAHAHAHA

That's some soft racism right there.

[Ulfrinn]

A lot of jobs for sure. Customer service, reception, art, music, it's even taking over in science and engineering. People have used AI to assist in developing cures and treatments for conditions already. If robotics continues to develop along side it, I wouldn't be surprised if you see it take over a lot of menial labor tasks like moving things in a warehouse, factory work.