安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
this was them flipping out about the people crying about Vram.....plus they had to compete with AMD as their card at the same price point had that much Vram and really used it.....
kinda close.....think of it more like motherboard is the body.....GPU are the eyes.....CPU still the brain.....
yeah no.....the cost ratio given the gains in hardware still do not justify the prices.......3080 GPU's only cost 80 dollars to make the core.....you really going to tell 700 was a good MSRP
the difference between a 3090 and a 3050 is the 3090 went through the manufacturing process flawlessly while the 3050 was in a slightly hotter part of the oven
when you pay for a GPU you are paying for both the hardware and the supporting software. efficient GPU drivers considerably increase performance without changing the hardware at all, how should this be priced with the GPU?