Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
this was them flipping out about the people crying about Vram.....plus they had to compete with AMD as their card at the same price point had that much Vram and really used it.....
kinda close.....think of it more like motherboard is the body.....GPU are the eyes.....CPU still the brain.....
yeah no.....the cost ratio given the gains in hardware still do not justify the prices.......3080 GPU's only cost 80 dollars to make the core.....you really going to tell 700 was a good MSRP
the difference between a 3090 and a 3050 is the 3090 went through the manufacturing process flawlessly while the 3050 was in a slightly hotter part of the oven
when you pay for a GPU you are paying for both the hardware and the supporting software. efficient GPU drivers considerably increase performance without changing the hardware at all, how should this be priced with the GPU?