Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
He might:
The U.N. has this to say about naming authority in the U.S.A.[unstats.un.org].
I'm not sure what rights New Mexico has regarding the matter though. They might make a 10th amendment resolution, and from there we argue about whether federal authority to establish the post office or regulate interstate commerce gives the U.S.A. naming latitude.
New America would be an incredibly daft name considering that it's in what would thence forth be referred to as Old America. and then what do we do with New York? I'd rather he didn't in any case. I suppose it's no less sensible than New Mexico though, considering the state was formed out of former Mexican territory in the first place.
It'd also likely waste an awful lot of stationary prelabled new mexico.
New Washington might be a better name, and yes, I know New Washington is the name of some cities already, but New York New York sets precedent for states and cities sharing names if he really doesn't like seeing the word Mexico on U.S. maps.
Or maybe New Franklin has a better ring to it. Not that there's an old place named Franklin to my knowledge
Or hey, he could name it New Gaza, grant all of the Palestinians citizenship and ship 'em off there if he's really serious about evacuating them to experience peace for a change...
Although the U.S.A. operates on a system of dual sovereignty, that depends on what federal law says, and if federal law or state law reigns supreme on the matter.
Trump would likely argue that the federal government has the authority to rename states for the purposes of the post office, or for the purposes of regulating commerce between the states or maybe argue that naming authority comes from the power to establish states with Article Ⅳ Section 3 powers.
If there is any constitutionally valid argument for the federal government to have naming jurisdiction over a state, then the supremacy clause kicks in and there isn't a thing New Mexico can do to stop it. If not the 10th amendment kicks in and New Mexico can choose to remain New Mexico or even change its name to Donsucksland if it likes.