Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There were 3 people in the room. None could figure out how to build it. The instructions were more confusing than one of those Chinese cabinets you'd order off Amazon.
As someone who lives in a country where teenagers during my teenage years could buy beer and wine at the age of 14 and buy tobacco at 16 (now its tobacco at 18 and soft alcohol at 14).
I say they should increase the drinking as well as smoking age to at least 29 or 30. People in their 20s are just way too immature to consume such type of drug and their pre-frontal cortex isn't fully developed.
The same should be applied to drink.
Also that below that age alredy manage to bypass that rule anyways...
Hell over here it's not even that hardly enforced. Just look old enough and you'll be served a cider or a beer just fine. It's hard liquor that might demand an ID and even then it's a soft maybe. People are better educated on drinking responsibly.
And there's always the Baileys situation in which kids drink it a bit during christmas because it's Baileys.
The goal is deterrence; not everybody will follow the law, and that's nothing new. If you make it more difficult the less people will bother trying.