安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
It has nothing to do with controlling what you see, it is simply ISP's making certain services (like Bittorrent) slower so that other services (like Youtube or Netflix) are faster. This is currently already how it works. If Net Neutrality becomes law, all services will be given equal priority.
ISP's have always throttled bandwidth for specific services (cheap ones especially).
It has everything to do with this, are you actually defending this?
Net neutrality was never a law but was always intended and this is how it works. They want to take that away so they can do whatever they want with it like they intended with Sopa.
This is much bigger then just ISP's controlling content and is much worse.
The problem is they don't want all services to have net neutrality, they want certain content to be fast and disrupt other content so they can control the flow of information.
Just imagine if personalities like King-Kotick-and more would be in control of the internet
In Brazil there is a law project that forces ISPs to log all sites visited by their clients, basically eveything they've done online. The data should be kept for 5 years and be available for law enforcement agencies within 12 hours of requisition. Although this law hasn't passed yet - there are several technical and structural problems with it, as you can imagine - lots of lobby money has been exchanging hands lately because of it. This law, in effect, gets rid of all and any anonymity one can have on the web.
All this that is happening in several countries, with governments trying to get any sort of control they can have over internet data and traffic, just goes to show that the internet has become threatening to those governments, more than it is dangerous or harmful to the individuals/citizens.
If the richest 1% get the control they want to give them they can regulate anything, put stuff beind a paywall and basically dictate other companies how to handle their business online and block everything they want. Not only illegal things but also legal stuff that hinders them.
They'll have the power to say; No more online free gaming (maybe stupid example but it's what they can do if this passes).
When Sopa got obliterated the first thing i said; i wonder what they'll come up next.
Apparantly this is it.
ISP's blocking stuff can easily be bypassed, it's only an annoyance.
The top 1% blocking, deleting and controlling the internet to their will is more then an annoyance.
If they were to do this, people would just move to another provider. Blocking access to high-traffic services like Youtube (and in this case Steam) would just mean people will go elsewhere and they lose their customers. It's in their best interests to make sure these services remain accessible.
Youtube and Netflix together make up over 50% of all data transfered over the Internet in the US. ISP's are basically having to build faster and bigger networks just to provide this service to users. Surely these bandwidth-hogging companies should also be contributing to the network costs if they are using such a massive part of it?
Let's say Steam is not by the 1%, if you don't want to wait 12 hours to download a game at slow speed you'll need to pay 1EUR for that specific download.
Want to upload high res art to DeviantArt? Another extra 1EUR.
Want to download Indie music from a free download website, even when the creator of that said music chooses that specific free download website as their sole distributor (lot's that do that), pay an extra fee.
From what you are describing, it sounds to me like you've been reading too much fear-mongering propaganda.
if it happens, everyone will stop using the internet for like a month and they will change it back.
Priority nr1 on the internet is always porn anyway.
ISP's have been lobbying governments all around the world to block those sites as well, it'll just be a matter of time before they charge extra for the feature to watch those content for the 90% of the population that doesn't know how to get around it.