Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e0n4piGt_VU is in my top 10 of all time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26EivpCPHnQ
They are all biased.
War.. War is gritty.. its not just,unjust, its not good/evil,.. its just.. war.. a struggle for survival
Stalingrad being favourite.
Colin Forbes: Tramp in Armour.
I read one book many years ago about a german soldier who served on the eastern front and who later became a luftwaffe pilot (don't have a clue on the book name). One detail was when he was a infantry soldier on the eastern front, he noted that he always had too walked to and from the front lines and that the USSR was just endless.
Another chapter talks about the weeks of boredom of just sitting there waiting for the soviets to attack or to attack them and that another point he mention that movies never show is that when a battle starts, not all soldiers are fighting at the same time.
May be hard too grasp from movies but he also mentions that he was about 600 metres away from a group of soldiers who were fighting the soviets while his squad was just sat there doing nothing all battle, just smoking and chatting.
What stuck out for me was when the squad was bombed and half of them were buried alive including himself, it described the terror in such detail that no film can.
In general, I think war movies should at least make an attempt to portray the horror of war.
Otherwise it just becomes glamorizing propaganda.
check this out... cursed movie tanks in movies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OL4CBFl99k
Yes that is exactly what I mean. I don't mind if the filmmakers used a fake that looks authentic,
but when they don't try very hard to conceal what the vehicle actually is, meh.
Such as this American Patton tank masquerading as a Tiger II, from The Battle of the Bulge.
http://pics.imcdb.org/0is208/tankbgyv0.3812.jpg
Tramp in Armour is about a single British tank getting caught behind enemy lines on the Western front, and, while trying to make its way back to the Allied side, having to deal with a lot of war stuff that isn't frontline battles along the way.
It can be pretty sobering at times. For example, the tank's gunner (I think) dying of a wound caused by a disgruntled leader of a looter gang after the squad tried to stop them from, well, looting.