Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
+1 to Rockstar though for actually making PC games.
By the way OP, didn't Remedy make Max Payne 1 and 2 and Rockstar made 3?
EDIT: Ah, Remedy developed MP 1 and 2 with Rockstar as the publisher, and Rockstar was the developer of 3 iirc.
Take off the rose-tinted shades. They sucked, as did 99% of all 3D platformers.
What's the state of 3D plat-forming today? All the old genres are coming back: space sims, isometric RPGs, point-n-clicks and even damned FMV; new 3D platformers are pretty much absent on the PC, now it could only exist by pretending to be something else.
I'm saying there is no real demand for it any more; 3D platformers were like FMV games in the early 90s, an experiment using new technology at the time, but largely fell flat because it was inferior to what came before. Sure, some were good (Mario Galaxy or Psychonaunts) but almost all the others all had the same problems (glitchy, annoying camera, bad controls that were both loose and demanded exactness at the same time etc).
If it was really as good as you recall, why aren't there more of these games being Greenlighted or Kickstarted? Nearly everything else has been.
If I wanted to be "hipsterish" about it, I could find "vintage" appeal in the genre. It's last holdout today is the Wii U, and now even Zelda is going open-world.