安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
It’s a weird societal standard where relationships (especially sexual ones) are seen as achievements rather than personal choices. The whole “virgin” insult just comes from that mindset—assuming that everyone must want the same things and that not having them makes someone lesser. It’s a shallow way of thinking, but unfortunately, it’s pretty common.
SO I think saying that "I'm just living life the best I can without worrying about that" is either a young person or someone that probably isn't in a healthy place for a relationship to begin with.
Have you ever heard of the word “asexual”?
The nuclear family is a creation of the church and state. There is no natural requirement for it. Successful men throughout history have been able to support multiple wives and concubines and the women are usually fine with it, as long as they are provided for. We are seeing a return to that nature now as modern liberated women are free to date whom they want rather than being expected to marry and have a family and, surprise surprise they would rather share the hyper-successful men than be locked into a marriage with an average joe.
The human nature is to reproduce with attractive partners, not to marry based on convention and live in a house with 2.5 children and a mortgage.