Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
And yes, people have been paying it for a decade. They have been paying it for a couple of years now for PC too. $50 games have been going out of the window for some time now.
It's not surprising that things have become more expensive.
There may or may not be a fancy word for that phenomenon.
One mobile game I played, there was a rumor that a guild leader spent 400,000 dollars equipping his guild with gold alliance gifts and misc ingame swag; he was a software owner. Crazy stuff
Triple-A game development is stupidly expensive nowadays. Making hyper-realistic graphics takes an insane amount of money for what overall ends up being diminishing returns.
Games should cost $80 now, be thankful they don't.
This is true but you also have to factor inflation. Cumulative rate of inflation since games retailed for $39.99 has been about 35% in the US and higher elsewhere. That's most of the increase in one fell swoop.
That's also true, but according to TabrisDarkPeace games should actually be $80. I suppose Triple-A development costing so much is why it takes a hell of a lot more $60 copies sold to make a profit rather than why games are $60.
Same game on PC with better graphics costs $60 or so.
Games have to be sold at cost and free to keep playing in Oz. ;-)
It's probably inflation doing its thing.