Gina Carano Fired From Disney and The Mandalorian

[Blue Falcon]

Gina Carano will no longer be in the Mandalorian. I will not share the details due to Steam rules, but look up the tweet that resulted in her termination.
This is just WRONG. It's not because the character is necessarily indispensable, but because of their reasons for taking her off. Disney has gone too far this time.
To repeat a tweet, "This is not the way."

[BanOphobia My Struggle]

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

It should bother everyone.

Oh sure. It's the most important cause that literally everyone should care about.

I can pick up five things that allegedly "should bother me" at every street corner.

People dropping non eco friendly litter to focus group camps in china is a different level of scale.

[Radene]

Tongue in Cheek Way of the Wang님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Oh sure. It's the most important cause that literally everyone should care about.

I can pick up five things that allegedly "should bother me" at every street corner.

People dropping non eco friendly litter to focus group camps in china is a different level of scale.

Oh, of course, of course. Terrible thing, that.

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

idc about firing the person itself or disney (♥♥♥♥ all of them)



i do care about though is the reason why they fired her. They're doing this all to bend over to their either overseas melings / maos or to their at home "online freedom fighters". Actually just no quotes b/c they're doing exactly that (fighting against your freedoms).



if it's any constellation some dude tried to get his followers to remove an anime (the one where the kid gets ikesai'd into a world and his dad's a serial forceful sperm donor with several unwilling sperm recipients) and got removed off of some billboard billy board some bill in the name site. They're facing legal actions lol.



Seriously though disney went down the drain around 2006 and star wars around 2012

[Radene]

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Oh sure. It's the most important cause that literally everyone should care about.

I can pick up five things that allegedly "should bother me" at every street corner.

Censorship should indeed bother you my friend, because it is happening right now. No one should ever feel threatened or afraid to share their feelings with others.

Except those other guys, right? You know, the ones "trying to take our freedom".

They should fear, right?

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Oh sure. It's the most important cause that literally everyone should care about.

I can pick up five things that allegedly "should bother me" at every street corner.

Censorship should indeed bother you my friend, because it is happening right now. No one should ever feel threatened or afraid to share their feelings with others.

it's funny if they don't ever say why you're fired. Instead just fire you.

Like tf you doing ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥? You're just as liable for your words as the person you're firing. Just leave them in the dark. What is this moral high ground ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ you wanna pull?



"oh we fired this person because their tweet hurt some grown adult's feelings!"
or
"we feel this person's views and morals don't align with our own morals or views".


It's damage control is what it is but one thing the word damage control is a little bit of an oxymoron since damage is inheritely random you cannot control it it'll just end up hitting you harder if you try to contain it.


Just fire them. Say sorry to say this but you're fired. Get out. There simple.

[BanOphobia My Struggle]

Red Bell Pepper Vampire님이 먼저 게시:

idc about firing the person itself or disney (♥♥♥♥ all of them)



i do care about though is the reason why they fired her. They're doing this all to bend over to their either overseas melings / maos or to their at home "online freedom fighters". Actually just no quotes b/c they're doing exactly that (fighting against your freedoms).



if it's any constellation some dude tried to get his followers to remove an anime (the one where the kid gets ikesai'd into a world and his dad's a serial forceful sperm donor with several unwilling sperm recipients) and got removed off of some billboard billy board some bill in the name site. They're facing legal actions lol.



Seriously though disney went down the drain around 2006 and star wars around 2012

Cancel Culture is the current trendy words you maybe looking for.

Personally I watched the Mando Luke reveal on Star War Theory Channel and he was crying and other people were tearing up in the chat/comments. I felt nothing and this is from someone who cried when they blew up the fluffy wuffy Ewoks.

Apathy the killer of Fandom's

[Devil`s Rejected]

Dude, Disney made Indiana Jones be raped. Remember South Park? So this is not really a surprise. Always thinking about

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

Tongue in Cheek Way of the Wang님이 먼저 게시:

Red Bell Pepper Vampire님이 먼저 게시:

idc about firing the person itself or disney (♥♥♥♥ all of them)



i do care about though is the reason why they fired her. They're doing this all to bend over to their either overseas melings / maos or to their at home "online freedom fighters". Actually just no quotes b/c they're doing exactly that (fighting against your freedoms).



if it's any constellation some dude tried to get his followers to remove an anime (the one where the kid gets ikesai'd into a world and his dad's a serial forceful sperm donor with several unwilling sperm recipients) and got removed off of some billboard billy board some bill in the name site. They're facing legal actions lol.



Seriously though disney went down the drain around 2006 and star wars around 2012

Cancel Culture is the current trendy words you maybe looking for.

Personally I watched the Mando Luke reveal on Star War Theory Channel and he was crying and other people were tearing up in the chat/comments. I felt nothing and this is from someone who cried when they blew up the fluffy wuffy Ewoks.

Apathy the killer of Fandom's

yeah but it also works both ways.

If you don't wanna ruin your company's image don't say ♥♥♥♥. Just fire them and move on. Don't try to make some moral b.s. statement. B/c if the person you fired was held accountable to their own words you are just as liable too. Even worse is you lose the support of millions of consumers who actually have a financial incentive.

You can always find another job acting or roles in movies or shows. You can't exactly start another company or branch if it dries up.

trying to cash in on the sjw cancel culture is like trying to sell ♥♥♥♥ aside from food and drugs at a hippy festival.

[Radene]

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Except those other guys, right? You know, the ones "trying to take our freedom".

They should fear, right?

They are the ones that are trying to take your freedom. And to prove my point about censorship. To keep you and I from continuing to have a discussion on this post ( whether we disagree or agree, it makes no difference )

This post will be locked very soon

So , in turn....you and I including everyone on this post will be censored

Of course, of course. Terrible, that. Truly.

[Fumo Bnnuy n Frends]

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

They are the ones that are trying to take your freedom. And to prove my point about censorship. To keep you and I from continuing to have a discussion on this post ( whether we disagree or agree, it makes no difference )

This post will be locked very soon

So , in turn....you and I including everyone on this post will be censored

Of course, of course. Terrible, that. Truly.

it's a slippery slope when you can fire people out of the blue for anything they say.

Especially for scumbag companies and coorperations and especially goverments (the biggest scummiest stupidest company / coorperations that ever exist at any one time on the planet).

[Polverrati]

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Patriot님이 먼저 게시:

They are the ones that are trying to take your freedom. And to prove my point about censorship. To keep you and I from continuing to have a discussion on this post ( whether we disagree or agree, it makes no difference )

This post will be locked very soon

So , in turn....you and I including everyone on this post will be censored

Of course, of course. Terrible, that. Truly.

Do you just pop in to be an obnoxious edgelord?

[Radene]

Red Bell Pepper Vampire님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Of course, of course. Terrible, that. Truly.

it's a slippery slope when you can fire people out of the blue for anything they say.

Especially for scumbag companies and coorperations and especially goverments (the biggest scummiest stupidest company / coorperations that ever exist at any one time on the planet).

It's so funny. When I was a teen, "the companies" were the good guys. "Creating jobs" and "free enterprise" and all that.

[Radene]

Corthmic님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Of course, of course. Terrible, that. Truly.

Do you just pop in to be an obnoxious edgelord?

Nah. I'm too dull to be an edgelord.

[Devil`s Rejected]

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

Red Bell Pepper Vampire님이 먼저 게시:

it's a slippery slope when you can fire people out of the blue for anything they say.

Especially for scumbag companies and coorperations and especially goverments (the biggest scummiest stupidest company / coorperations that ever exist at any one time on the planet).

It's so funny. When I was a teen, "the companies" were the good guys.

Are you like 80 or something? lol joking. But you know how times change. Greed is a growing state either we like it or not.

[Radene]

Black Knight Satellite님이 먼저 게시:

Radene님이 먼저 게시:

It's so funny. When I was a teen, "the companies" were the good guys.

Are you like 80 or something? lol joking. But you know how times change. Greed is a growing state either we like it or not.

Yeah, but greed used to be "good", too. And "ambition". You know, a man who could bend the world to his whims and get rid of ("cancel", as it were) anything in his way, was considered a role model.

It indeed is funny how times change. We created heroes, looked at them another time, and decided they're villains. Oh and that we totally didn't create them.