Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
Diskussionsregler og retningslinjer
Rapporter dette indlæg
As someone who has played DOTA 2 and some League of Legends it's pretty much that.
How is it addictive? That is a question I cannot answer. Maybe I should install Dota again and see what happens.
Overwatch is the only thing that’s close, but it still relies on increasingly simplistic and limited role compositions in its meta.
As an example, I play League, and I also play a lot of Neeko. Neeko is an AP character, so she deals damage through abilities. Every 3rd auto attack, which is an AD attack, deals bonus magic damage on-hit. I build Nashor's Tooth on Neeko mid, which grants both attack speed and AP, so I get to quickly stack my ability's passive, and I still get AP.
That's not even the most powerful Neeko build, and it's pretty rare, but I win a lot of games using it. Don't see that in the fighter or FPS genre, do you?
And even as sport its the most successful among all e-sport (lol and dota2)
Class shooters arent the thing nowadays... Thats extremtly outdated and they became irrelevant ,nowadays the thing are agent shooters ,class shooters but they keep making new classes (or aka new characters/new agents) ,basically r6 siege or valorant
Fighting games are boring for most as well... So obviously they became forgotten
And not everyone is into MMO either
These are not equivalent things. The MOBA "genre" is... a genre of game, just like other team-based PVP games may have their own basic "genre."
What's the allure of "Battle Chess?" Anyone ever play it? It's a simple twist on chess - The pieces fight for the square. Though, in the original, it wasn't much more than just an animation. IIRC, "Archon" was a bit better there in terms of mechanics.
But, that tactical battle-board in a MOBA has a big impact on how characters see gameplay. You may find some equivalencies there in team-based, static map, PVP games of all sorts. There are known objectives, known hazards, and a defined play-space where the players take the "rules" and use them to achieve their goal.
That's a Big Deal in making a game satisfying.
Game players learn the game's rules and use the tools they've been given, or can acquire, to accomplish a desired goal <--- That's "computer gaming."
So, the rules (map/mechanics), tools (class/character/physicality) and goal (win) are all there in the game and very, very, plain to see. The PVP nature makes the use of all of these elements "competitive," which is a big draw for another segment of players.
Contrast that with something like a class-based FPS. What's a huge draw, there, that may not be as easily evident in a MOBA? "Physicality" is the appropriate answer... Like with any "action" game, MOBAs have physicality and can be just as frantic as a big arcady FPS game. But, in the FPS game, the physicality is built upon to immerse the player in a more personal, intimate, narrative and is easily reflected in the game's presentation. That physicallity of moving across terrain, jumping, dodging, looking around a corner, 360-no-scope-headshots... It's "different" than in a MOBA, even if there are a few analogues for that.
Their appeal, though, focuses on some different things. For instance, a Class-Based FPS doesn't have as significant an emphasis on "loud-out." Sure, if you're a Medic, you won't necessarily be hunting tanks. Your class only "sort of" defines your role and your on-the-fly decisions and physical interactions are much more emphasized. In a MOBA, your character selection is much more nuanced and players who properly use their knowledge about all the intricate rules and play to maximize that advantage can get an advantage before the match-play button is even pressed.
These two different sorts of games aren't equivalent in play or presentation, so the OP question is moot. But, certain players may be more attracted to one over the other due to the gameplay they provide and what the game reinforces as being important in terms of player interaction.
MMOs are wayyyyyy too expensive and there's too much grinding in them to appeal to people.
Fighting games are often too hard and also don't appeal to people.
Usually character/role/class games tend to also have very bad developers who don't really care to keep the game alive.
Cough cough, TF2 and Paladins. Rip two amazing games pretty much.