How to Stop Hurricane

[Getmegreek]

Okay call me crazy but I might have a few ideas

1) Drop a small atom or nuclear bomb in the mid-air of the eye of Hurricane to blow away the clouds and cause disruption but consequences are radiation and death of aqua marine life

2) Perhaps better choice would be Hydrogeon Bomb drop mid-air in the eye of the storm?

3) What about EMP? Probably won’t work because it only affects electronic - not Mother Nature

Got any crazy ideas how to stop it?

So remember this is only for the eye of hurricane over the ocean - far away from the mainland when you drop something in the hurricane



UPDATE* WAIT GUYS I MIGHT HAVE A SOLUTION

WHAT IF WE ESTABLISH A LONG LINE OF WIND OR FORM OF WIND BLOWER AT HIGH SPEED ALIGNED ALONG THE EARTH EQUATOR WHERE THE HURRICANE BEGIN TO BREW UP

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

Hurricanes start by all the hot air in washington mixing with their cold hearts.

[trousers]

How to stop hurricane: hold up a stop sign

[Getmegreek]

Do hurricanes ever hit Europe?

[Acetyl]

Messaggio originale di Triple G:

Messaggio originale di Acetyl:

It wouldn't matter either way. It doesn't hinge on belief.

"As our climate warms, we’re experiencing stronger winds, higher storm surges and record rainfalls during hurricane season — which is also why these storms are becoming more destructive and costly."

Also from May 2024:
"NOAA National Weather Service forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center predict above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. NOAA’s outlook for the 2024 Atlantic hurricane season, which spans from June 1 to November 30, predicts an 85% chance of an above-normal season, a 10% chance of a near-normal season and a 5% chance of a below-normal season.

NOAA is forecasting a range of 17 to 25 total named storms (winds of 39 mph or higher). Of those, 8 to 13 are forecast to become hurricanes (winds of 74 mph or higher), including 4 to 7 major hurricanes (category 3, 4 or 5; with winds of 111 mph or higher). Forecasters have a 70% confidence in these ranges."

Or is there some old Hebrew number combination which says otherwise?

All of that would be fine and good if we hadn't had the ability to spray the sky with conductive metals embedded in microplastic polymers while bombarding small areas of the ionosphere with phased array grids operating in the 100's of gigawatts. So there are some other factors you have to deal with.

[Acetyl]

Messaggio originale di Triple G:

Or is there some old Hebrew number combination which says otherwise?

Earth's orbital speed is said to be 66,616 mph by the way. The average distance of the moon to Earth is 108 times the moon's diameter (2160 miles, or 1080 radius, 216 is 6x6x6), the sun is 108 sun diameters from the earth. Buddhist prayer necklaces have 108 beads, Egyptian mala have 108 beads. The sun, the moon, and the earth can be constructed just by making a single 3-4-5 triangle.

66
http://billheidrick.com/works/hgm1/hg0060.htm#66
-A ship (the heavens were seen as a sea).
-To turn or wind
-I will go
-To mark off, measure

616
http://billheidrick.com/works/hgm4/hg0610.htm#616
-Deep things
-Remainder

111 is the magic square of the sun. In some contexts it represents the middle pillar, balancing of mercy and severity. In others that's 101, passing through the gateway to the temple, between boaz and jachin.

[Triple G]

Messaggio originale di Acetyl:

All of that would be fine and good if we hadn't had the ability to spray the sky with conductive metals embedded in microplastic polymers while bombarding small areas of the ionosphere with phased array grids operating in the 100's of gigawatts. So there are some other factors you have to deal with.

Between the line i said it would have also been possible to do something against it some decades ago. If one had listened to the scientists. But even now only 50% of the Americans see the climate as a major threat. Ranked 17th out of 21 national issues. Comparison: France: 83%. While the US opted out of some agreements, which made others say: "Oh - if they don´t do it - why should we do it? They contribute much more anyways."

[Acetyl]

Messaggio originale di Triple G:

Messaggio originale di Acetyl:

All of that would be fine and good if we hadn't had the ability to spray the sky with conductive metals embedded in microplastic polymers while bombarding small areas of the ionosphere with phased array grids operating in the 100's of gigawatts. So there are some other factors you have to deal with.

Between the line i said it would have also been possible to do something against it some decades ago. If one had listened to the scientists. But even now only 50% of the Americans see the climate as a major threat. Ranked 17th out of 21 national issues. Comparison: France: 83%. While the US opted out of some agreements, which made others say: "Oh - if they don´t do it - why should we do it? They contribute much more anyways."

Superficial (purported) public opinion is irrelevant. The people with power would just twist it do what they already want to do, in a different set of clothes, under a different banner. Same act.

[HarleyIsntReal]

a really really really big fan might work

[Michael]

Messaggio originale di HarleyIsntReal:

a really really really big fan might work

I second this motion..

[Triple G]

Messaggio originale di Acetyl:

Superficial (purported) public opinion is irrelevant.

I thought for that reason the Americans have guns. Sad when only the republicans use them, which only to 23% see climate as major threat...

That being said: Perhaps it works if many, many people shoot as much as possible against the rotation direction of the hurricane, no?

[Acetyl]

Messaggio originale di Triple G:

Messaggio originale di Acetyl:

Superficial (purported) public opinion is irrelevant.

I thought for that reason the Americans have guns. Sad when only the republicans use them, which only to 23% see climate as major threat...

That being said: Perhaps it works if many, many people shoot as much as possible against the rotation direction of the hurricane, no?

Itwould be more effective to steer it by recognizing "as above, so below". Namely, Earth is a giant circuit, and that when you modify the ionospheric charge or currents in an area, it will alter the telluric currents in the Earth due to that potential difference between the ionosphere and the ground. And likewise with the inverse. So you would due this through heating, making high pressure domes with a rotation opposed to that of the hurricane, or with it, as the case would be. You could sue temperature, as in endothermic reactions. You could even seed the ocean with iron.

[Acetyl]

eg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_precipitation?useskin=vector

National Security Advisor under Jimmy Carter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski
Between Two Ages, 1970 (https://archive.org/details/pdfy-z5FBdAnrFME2m1U4/mode/2up)
Page 55:
"The "new" nationalism has many elements of the old nationalism, especially in some of the new nations. There nationalism is still a radical, changing force creatively mobilizing community feelings but also prompting ethnic exclusiveness and conflicts. Yet it is generally true, as the author of a suggestive paper notes, that "the vision and objectives of society [have] changed. Today a new concept of man and his world is challenging the concepts of the Renaissance which have guided man's behavior for the past five hundred years." The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: "International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state." But as the nation-state is gradually yielding its sovereignty, the psychological importance of the national community is rising, and the attempt to establish an equilibrium between the imperatives of the new internationalism and the need for a more intimate national community is the source of frictions and conflicts.

The achievement of that equilibrium is being made more difficult by the scientific and technological innovations in weaponry. It is ironic to recall that in 1878 Friedrich Engels, commenting on the Franco-Prussian War, proclaimed that "weapons used have reached such a stage of perfection that further progress which would have any revolutionizing influence is no longer possible." Not only have new weapons been developed but some of the basic concepts of geography and strategy have been fundamentally altered; space and weather control have replaced Suez or Gibraltar as key elements of strategy.

In addition to improved rocketry, multi-missiles, and more powerful and more accurate bombs, future developments may well include automated or manned space warships, deep-sea installations, chemical and biological weapons, death rays, and still other forms of warfare---even the weather may be tampered with. * These new weapons could either encourage expectations of one-sided, relatively "inexpensive" victory; permit proxy contests that will be decisive in their strategic political outcome but will be fought by only a few human beings (as in the Battle of Britain) or even by robots in outer space;46 or simply create such mutual instability that the breakdown of peace will become inevitable, in spite of man's rational recognition of the futility of war.

"In addition, it may be possible — and tempting — to exploit for strategic-political purposes the fruits of research on the brain and on human behavior. Gordon J. F. MacDonald, a geophysicist specializing in problems of warfare, has written that accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes "could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth. ... In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period. ... No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."

Such technology will be available primarily, and to begin with exclusively, to the most advanced countries. But it is likely that in the coming decades some states in the Third World will have taken major steps toward acquiring-or will have acquired highly destructive weaponry. Even if they are not capable of using it against the major powers without bringing about their own extinction, they may be able and tempted to use it in "underworld" wars among themselves. The question then arises whether such wars would be interpreted by the major powers as posing a direct threat to the fabric of peace, and whether a joint response by them would be effectively mounted and imposed. The absence of accepted global institutions could temporarily be overcome by ad hoc arrangements and agreements designed to meet specific threats, but it is conceivable that in some cases there will not be sufficient unanimity to permit joint reactions. The mutual annihilation of some lesser states thus remains at least a possibility."

* As one specialist noted, "By the year 2018, technology will make available to the leaders of the major nations a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised. One nation may attack a competitor covertly by bacteriological means, thoroughly weakening the population ( though with a minimum of fatalities) before taking over with its own overt armed forces. Alternatively, techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a nation's capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor" ( Gordon J. F. MacDonald, "Space," in Toward the Year 2018, p. 34).

* This has led one concerned scholar to comment, "Whether it is used to kill, hurt, nauseate, paralyze, cause hallucination, or to terrify military personnel and civilians, the systematic use of biological and chemical warfare will require the resolution of major moral and ethical problems" ( Donald N. Michael, "Some Speculations on the Social Impact of Technology," mimeographed text of address to the Columbia University Seminar on Technology and Social Change, p. 6)."

However, do you actually need high power levels? Research conducted since the writing of this book on "complex physiologically patterned" magnetic fields (covered previously) found responses in the micro and nanotesla range. The last paper I'm aware of published by Bawin and Adey used a Helmholtz coil to generate a 1 Hz magnetic field. Disruption of theta rhythm (rhythmic slow activity) was observed in slices of rat hippocampus in <10 minutes, at an intensity of 56 uT (the upper range of the geomagnetic field's strength). The effect was absent at 5.6uT, and when using 60 Hz (power frequency).

In terms of weather control (and weather warfare), beyond creating regions of high pressure, diverting moisture, causing monsoon or prolonged drought, cloud seeding, chemically nucleating rain and ice, etc, weather control has an "energetic" component, or consequence. For example spraying conductive metallic nanoparticles (eg aluminum) suspended in synthetic polymers (mimicking spider web) in the upper atmosphere creates a viable nucleating surface for water droplets, or use of ionospheric heaters to space them out into bands and heat them up, alters the energetic character of the space between the atmosphere and the surface. Even an influence from the electric grid and particularly high voltage powerlines, would influence the charge of these upper regions. And therefore, the pattern and magnitude of the "electron rain", and the voltage between the atmosphere and the surface, would be altered. See the section above on physiologically patterned / brainwave frequency fields.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionospheric_heater
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_precipitation

See Becker and Marino for more.
https://www.andrewamarino.com/PDFs/F045-AmicusCuriaBriefOnExceptions1978.pdf
Starting page 10 or so.
https://www.andrewamarino.com
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236402410_High_Voltage_Lines_Hazard_at_a_Distance

Example of endothermic chemical ice nucleation (using barium hydroxide octahydrate and ammonium nitrate)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA_OdwIt_tw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQkJI-Nq3Os
Artificial snow in China.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/6481650/Chinese-government-makes-it-snow-in-Beijing-in-order-to-fight-drought.html

[DarkCrystalMethod]

Someone mentioned the space laser(the one that doesn't officially exist).
Fire it so that the hurricane follows the path of the laser(like a cat would)
Also water along the coastline should be cooled so that it drains the hurricaine's speed, so get all those snow making machines from Colorado and Big Bear(and other Skii lodges), line them up and give it full power.

[Triple G]

Doesn´t Elon Musk have a device which You can implement into the hurricane? Like some AI - so You can actually communicate and negotiate with the hurricane? Perhaps You can convince it to go to Mexico instead - if it accepts some money. Billions and billions of immigrants sadly dead - and You can say it´s was just nature - You couldn´t do anything. And then You keep two hurricanes at the southern border. And every time someone gets close, they would move from east to west and vice versa - with really high speed. You say that You can´t explain this natural phenomenon. Then Your issue No.2 would be solved as well - and the climate issue can move from 17 to 21 - or crossed out of the list, so You only have 20 national issues to address.

[Acetyl]

Messaggio originale di Triple G:

Doesn´t Elon Musk have a device which You can implement into the hurricane? Like some AI - so You can actually communicate and negotiate with the hurricane? Perhaps You can convince it to go to Mexico instead - if it accepts some money. Billions and billions of immigrants sadly dead - and You can say it´s was just nature - You couldn´t do anything. And then You keep two hurricanes at the southern border. And every time someone gets close, they would move from east to west and vice versa - with really high speed. You say that You can´t explain this natural phenomenon. Then Your issue No.2 would be solved as well - and the climate issue can move from 17 to 21 - or crossed out of the list, so You only have 20 national issues to address.

Elon was hard at work on it (part of his Star Trek universal translator project) but pfizer got there first with a hurricane vaccine. So there's no need to negotiate with terrorists, just make them immune.