Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
which is basically: "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth"...
The phrase "an eye for an eye" is meant to refer to the idea that people should be punished in the same way they offended; (Shoot, then get shot back).
Use ONLY in defense against a known dangerous threat (NOT for offense).
For if someone uses one in criminal offense, you should have the lawful right & duty to use one on them in defense ("an eye for an eye").. even if you have to use a Heckler & Koch 9mm, or a knife, or your fist/foot (or crowbar, lol) to clear the dangerous threat and get the job done.
Which life really matters more? The deranged hostile criminal, who is just a dead weight to society?, or yours?
"They are utilitarian killing machines" hunting
y do you make an exception for movies btw?
It's good enough for Han Solo and Leon Kennedy. The only way it could be better if they named it the C sixty-nine instead.