Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It is the intentional creation of a work by the artist to communicate a message to another person that is greater than the sum of its parts.
Good art achieves that.
Bad art does not.
i like this
how sweet
Well, the definition I wrote should be self-explanatory. BUT, it is nuanced..
If you write a classical symphony and there's a guy in the audience that just "doesn't get it" and that your choices of tone/note/whatever "just don't make sense" to him... is that "Bad Art?"
No.
Your audience for that piece wasn't "him." Not all art must be made to appeal to all observers. It's just not possible to do, anyway, but it has to be recognized just the same... You can't speak to everyone, you just try hard to speak well to those who can hear you.
There is, however, an idea among Bad Artists that if their work doesn't appeal to you then it must be your fault... and that you're not capable of seeing "Good Art."
Did the guy in the audience that couldn't decipher the message think the music was bad or terrible? Probably not. He probably didn't understand the enthusiasm of the other audience members.
What if you make a game that has ten fans, but fifty-eleven product returns and a game-journalism industry that calls it "crap?" Is it good "art" because ten people like it? Probably not. So, there are limits in how far someone can claim their art is demonstrably "good" too.
That's right.
Whatever's AI managed to create by connecting the dots is no longer seen as art by me.
It's.. What.. I don't even know?
A creation of a few algorithms working together, I guess..
I think there's art all around us, it comes in many shapes and forms.
Painting a circle inside a square, or gluing banana peal to a canvas is not art. And never will be.
i don't say that humans can't do art. I am telling a different thing here.
We can do art but can't describe it.
Just as, Mankind HAVE souls, but we can't describe them.