安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
The big picture is that North Korea was developing bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger scud-missiles that it wouldn't matter where the conflict is on the planet.
It scared Europe that the Ottoman empire would again attempt to conquer both Russia and Europe.
It's not that they used scud missiles but that they were willing to use them.
It wouldn't matter what they had inside of the warhead or on whom or where their opponents live.
The irony. USA is only involved because of Israel having people living in USA, makes the idea of Israel completely obsolete.
First off, the war was unjustified. None of the 9/11 terrorists were Iraqi nationals. Most of them were Saudi Arabian nationals, but for some reason the USA never sought to retaliate against Saudi Arabia. Also there were absolutely no WMD's in Iraq and while Saddam did want nuclear weapons, the Iraqi nuclear program was a total joke. You could compare it to the Zambian Space Program.
Secondly, while Saddam was a brutal and iron-fisted tyrant - nobody can deny that - he had to be in that part of the world. If he wasn't he would have been killed and replaced by someone else brutal and iron-fisted. That's just how that part of the world works.
What he did do was constantly wage war against his neighbors and he kept his borders closed. Any refugees who trespassed would be shot, or worse, gassed. I did a paper on him in college and he was vilified for driving back an invasion of Iraq by bombing the invading soldiers with mustard gas.
I don't think it's a coincidence that after the USA "brought freedom" to certain parts of the middle east, like Iraq and Afghanistan, that there was a huge mass migration of muslims from the middle east into western countries. I think Saddam was a stabilizing force in that region of the world and he was helping to hold back a massive tide of refugees.
I think the USA massively ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up in the middle east after 9/11 and I think the big reason that Bush invaded Iraq is because he personally didn't like Saddam. Saddam once threatened Bush Sr. and I think Bush Jr. is such a naive manchild that he took it personally and started a war just to make his old man happy.
*Anyone remember Saddam's public execution? How many other times has the USA broadcast a public execution. Never that I can remember. But the MSM did that, despite the fact that everyone in our government knew for a fact by that time that Iraq had no WMD's and was not reponsible for 9/11. I think it was Bush who wanted Saddam to be publicly executed. It was personal.
We created a bigger mess in Iraq, that simply saw MORE terrorists join a "cause" and make us pariahs on the world stage. We even renamed French fries to "freedom fries" simply because France didn't support the invasion. Talk about being petty. It's why the "Mission Accomplished" banner was so laughable and ridiculous.
I'd have to know everyone that was involved in the decision. I know he made the choice but I highly doubt there wasn't talk before it happened.
If I remember correctly there were people on the Left wanting to go at first, too.
So if we are trying to make this into a left vs. right thing you are failing massively.
Knowing Bush Jr. wasn't exactly one of the greatest Presidents I'd have to say no, though. Not because he was a schizoid but because they didn't have a plan in place worthy of finishing the job correctly.
During the world war two there was no other option than to invade another country to defeat the germans.
Like I mentioned North Korea was invaded for developing ICBM.
Israel is a colony created by UK and they were poking their sticks into the colony.
To them the world is all about religion. To the west everything is about nations and liberty.
Two world views collide with each other since one think they can just throw in sticks into the wheel.
Iraq created a power balance by pushing people back into the country by terrorize their neighbours to emmigrate from their regions into Iraq.
But these war games aren't as much working when they're buying weapons whose ultimate goal is to become nuclear intercontinental missiles.
North Korea made weapons to Sovjet Russia. These weapons later on sold to Iraq.
When Sovjet collapsed, nuclear warheads in sovjet went missing. Research and scientists in Russia left the country and went to other nations.
As result the collapse of Sovjet flooded the gates for the rest of the world to have their own access of nuclear weapons.
This is why speculations and gambling on the future is key as you can be denying all you want but the ultimate goal of the scud missile is to become a nuclear warhead.
They don't have to self being able to create the warheads. With development of liquid warheads known as heavy water, nations may find it funny to give it to countries just to see what they will do with it. All data has a value, especially when it's about the unknown.
When Ukraine start to use long range missiles they're no better than Iraq.
Whose side are you on? First they create long range missiles. Then they mount nuclear weapons on them.
I bet if not India, perhaps China would want Russia to disappear on the map for creating geological sea blockades in the east. That would as well benefit USA. That is why Ukraine war has been allowed to continue. Russia is unable to defeat Ukraine and doesn't want it to end. Since it would create too many questions. It is only after the war you're allowed to criticize actions.
You can't expect the world to be standing still. Someone will find a way. Dig deep enough and eventually you will find it.
George W Bush and his New World Order.
It's the opposite that George W created the Arabic empire when he made the rest of the countries realize that they're invited to dance with USA and challenge on the stage, it was no longer a game in their backwater region. They're now in the big league with usa. China, india, Europe.
It matters who you are in war with. Since countries see them as equals. That is why USA and Afghanistan see each other as equals in capacity.
That gives a picture that most is talk. We buying a dream.