Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Or did you mean the adjustments to nomenclature and terms in the Indian Act per the 1982 Constitution?
A government that doesn't fear its people, feels safe to take every right away at a time of its choosing.
They're not numb. They're unable to speak as they're too stupid.
And there's lots of stupid people out there who think you need laws to have rights to speak.
Those laws are only valid in private. In practice everything is an element of jurisdiction.
Because these laws are how you suppose to live. If you have a law saying you have the right to speak that is what is required of you.
But at the same time if someone saying you have the right to remain silent, that is what they require of you.
If you remain silent you become an easy victim of people who taken your freedom. And what you saying is a technicality as you were under influence of authority.
Natural Rights: These are rights believed to exist inherently in all human beings, regardless of the law or government. The U.S. Declaration of Independence refers to these as 'unalienable rights,' which include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Legal Rights: These are specific rights granted and protected by the legal framework of a particular country. The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is an example of a legal right. It protects the freedom of speech as a fundamental right within the U.S. context, reflecting the belief that this freedom is a natural right deserving of legal protection."
All people SHOULD be able to have their natural right of freedom of speech, but when a country disallows it by law, it is not a violation of a legal right, but natural right.
Good catch!
I got a warning today for an innocuous remark in a music thread.
There is no freedom of speech anywhere, there are only corporate rules.
They must be obeyed.