Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Off Topic > Detalhes do tópico
1st Amendment as a guaranteed human right
The internationalists' violation of the 1st amendment would devastate everyone. Let us stand up for our blessed right to freedom of speech.:steamthumbsup:
Escrito originalmente por Ȼħⱥꞥꞥēł8753452:
Anyone who wishes to "revise" (as in further restrict) human rights is an enemy to everyone.

Maybe you're happy with some group you dislike being restricted and prosecuted, but it is only a matter of time before it's you. :spycon:
< >
Exibindo comentários 1626 de 26
Escrito originalmente por Plaid:
The people need to be forever vigilant, and not look to heroes.
Never idolize anyone ever
Ulfrinn 2/set./2024 às 18:51 
How can internationalists violate the first amendment rights of everyone when the first amendment isn't international and is a right only to Americans as it's the first amendment to the US constitution. Non Americans trying to evoke their first amendment rights when they're not even in the US is funny though.
Dames & Games 2/set./2024 às 20:13 
Escrito originalmente por Ulfrinn:
How can internationalists violate the first amendment rights of everyone when the first amendment isn't international and is a right only to Americans as it's the first amendment to the US constitution. Non Americans trying to evoke their first amendment rights when they're not even in the US is funny though.
I marked a answer, hopefully you can understand from now on.
just try talikng about covid on youtube that isnt fowchiuuplegus approved and see how long your speech privleges last
Ganger 3/set./2024 às 4:21 
Amendment rights are purely a american thing designed to protect american's. They don't exist outside of the united states. While other nations have their own set of rules in place, some fair while others not so fair.
tmwfte 3/set./2024 às 8:41 
Yes. Accepting Manitoba into Canada is totally a fundamental human right.

Or did you mean the adjustments to nomenclature and terms in the Indian Act per the 1982 Constitution?
Rio 3/set./2024 às 8:46 
Rights don't mean anything, if no one fights for them.

A government that doesn't fear its people, feels safe to take every right away at a time of its choosing.
talemore 3/set./2024 às 9:04 
The word for people who can't speak is : Dumb.

They're not numb. They're unable to speak as they're too stupid.

And there's lots of stupid people out there who think you need laws to have rights to speak.

Those laws are only valid in private. In practice everything is an element of jurisdiction.

Because these laws are how you suppose to live. If you have a law saying you have the right to speak that is what is required of you.

But at the same time if someone saying you have the right to remain silent, that is what they require of you.

If you remain silent you become an easy victim of people who taken your freedom. And what you saying is a technicality as you were under influence of authority.
Hooch 3/set./2024 às 9:05 
Escrito originalmente por Havana Syndrome Gun:
The internationalists' violation of the 1st amendment would devastate everyone. Let us stand up for our blessed right to freedom of speech.:steamthumbsup:
You seem to be conflating two types of rights:

Natural Rights: These are rights believed to exist inherently in all human beings, regardless of the law or government. The U.S. Declaration of Independence refers to these as 'unalienable rights,' which include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Legal Rights: These are specific rights granted and protected by the legal framework of a particular country. The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is an example of a legal right. It protects the freedom of speech as a fundamental right within the U.S. context, reflecting the belief that this freedom is a natural right deserving of legal protection."


All people SHOULD be able to have their natural right of freedom of speech, but when a country disallows it by law, it is not a violation of a legal right, but natural right.
Hooch 3/set./2024 às 9:24 
Escrito originalmente por Kiddiec͕̤̱͋̿͑͠at 🃏:
On July 14, 2024 the topic creator responded to a topic with : "Ban OP for low IQ question." but supposedly you stand for free speech.

Now, there's nothing wrong with holding both of those perspectives except for the fact that they're in direct contradiction with each other and therefore don't appear to be genuine.
Ah, so the op is guilty of: "some group you dislike being restricted and prosecuted,", which he quoted as the solution/answer to his opening post.

Good catch! :behind:
Ni-Neith 3/set./2024 às 9:39 
Escrito originalmente por Havana Syndrome Gun:
The internationalists' violation of the 1st amendment would devastate everyone. Let us stand up for our blessed right to freedom of speech.:steamthumbsup:
You are wrong.
I got a warning today for an innocuous remark in a music thread.
There is no freedom of speech anywhere, there are only corporate rules.
They must be obeyed.
< >
Exibindo comentários 1626 de 26
Por página: 1530 50

Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Off Topic > Detalhes do tópico
Publicado em: 2/set./2024 às 18:01
Mensagens: 25