Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
I'm asking a question of if the Kadyrovites are leading the counter offensive or are they still barrier troops for a Russian force that is making gains through there (according to Russian media they retaken ten towns).
If I was a commander of Ukrainian forces in Kursk I would do what the Russians have done to Ukraine and heavily mine the area however Russian authorities are hardly humanitarians and would likely tell the Russian civilians the area is clears and safe and let them clear the mines through stepping on them in daily life.
If Ukraine withdraw from Kursk I would guess they will either reinforce fighting (or find antoher strategy to deal with) Pokrovsk offensive.
Possibly try Crimea but that will heavily depend on what is going on around Pokrovsk.
Find another weak spot and this time really drive into Russian territory and not let Russian forces build trenches.
for crimea they need to take the estern part of the dniepr river and what i read currently russia try to take control of islands in the river and prepare defense to be ready if ukraine launch offensive in this zone
There was also heavy counter attack at Pokrovsk so not sure how that will go.
The reluctance I would have in using mines would be against the civilian population if the Russians felt that they wanted the farming lands being productive again. That is output being lost all the time Ukraine is on that land.
The people whose land it is they don't know about the war and if they did know outside of the propaganda there is not much they could do to stop it.
so the risk of mines if the delay strategy (which "should" be the primary aim of mines) does not work against the Russian forces would turn into one of murder against people who were just farming or working in local shops.
Russians developed a butterfly / leaf type of mine, an evil mine (if one mine could be more evil than another) and it is designed with civilians in mind.
The mine does not look like your typical land mine.
you could be kicking through some leaves in the autumn pick up this odd looking object and you would be fine, touch another part of it at same time and BANG.
They are designed in a way not to fall straight so they can land in peoples homes through open windows.
Anybody could pick one up and not know what it was as long as they don't touch the other part of it they are fine and take it home say 'look what i found' shows the family and BANG.
Evil things those mines.
Sorry for going on a tangent.
So the laying of mines would be a potentially controversial move.
I would have used the Kursk invasion as a way of "forward command" for drones amongst other things of drawing other Russian forces to the area to take some pressure from Prokovsk.
Military Analyst Sean Bell said they could have taken a couple of thousand prisoners with a flanking move from east to west and there would be little the Russian soldiers there could do to stop it. Whether Ukraine capitalised on this I did not check up.
Lord of War?
That is a brilliant film on arms dealing I would recommend it, it is stylised because its hollywood with Nicholas Cage but it is a very good film in my opinion and the actions within it happened and accurate (apparently I am not a gun runner but going by experts of the field).
Showed how global trade is especially in weapons.
~I was wondering if Ukraine was holding back and going to really mine the heck out of Pokrovsk and then counter attack with a some reserves waiting for that very eventuality using NATO kit.
sorry but 1000 km square of farm land is not so critical when you need defense line against your opponant, mine field is useful to slow down or stop offensive, so if russian dont have project to launch offensive from kursk your ukrainian mine field also help them in their defense line against ukraine
sorry but when you prepare defense it not matter if you build your defense on your land or your opponant land, if your land offer better defense line so go ahead and build your defense there
but they know they are in war, they are bombed by artillery, drone and missile since at least one year and see explosion every week
the place is mostly wood and village, not so much critical and it is not going the first place to turn into militay zone for very long time, so unlikely your farmer and local shoper going back there, they probably going to move to farming and shoping around mariopol area
but it is what ukrainian tried, but russian keeping their pressure around Pokrovsk
it is nearly 3 weeks i read that and after 3 weeks ukrainian offensive stall in kurk and with russian counter offensive you can forget Sean Bell plan, it would be possible in august, but now seem ukraine lack of resource, russian put too much pressure around Pokrovsk and with russian counter offensive in kursk it mean it going to be too risky for ukraine and they are forced to play defensive game to contain russian counter offensive, maybe they are forced to retreat, especially when i read than ukraine didnt build yet defense in kursk
The US needs to stop sending money to non-allies and instead spend it on its own citizens in need.
Let Europe deal with Ukraine/Russia.
The US should not be the World Police.
Though in many circumstances "Police" and "Bully" are interchangeable.