Russia set to ‘build fake London

[Lone Wolf]

This has be a joke ???? just think all them boat people can be rehomed in that new london city

Russia set to ‘build fake London out of plywood then nuke it’ in warning to West


https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/russia-build-fake-london-plywood-nuclear-test-warning

[Lupinus Rictus]

Abaddon the Despoiler eredeti hozzászólása:

Can Russia afford that much plywood?

Don't they need to rebuild their navy?

They supply a lot of the world's plywood, so uh probably can afford it

[Uncle Sam]

Frankie eredeti hozzászólása:

Lone Wolf eredeti hozzászólása:

Russia set to ‘build fake London out of plywood then nuke it’ in warning to West

What's the message.

Wood burns? Silly bastards.

Eh essentially these videos, albeit without real people in the UK being atomized during the first few minutes of Mutually Assured Destruction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UMKcnuYt0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WiTxQYzrZI

Either way the ones to be nuked first might be Germany, Italy & Japan. 2nd being UK, France, USA, Russia, Pakistan, Bharat (India), Israel, Iran, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, etc.

[Armagon]

Russia still crying?

[kingjames488]

Heuristic eredeti hozzászólása:

Russia still crying?

they've just got buyers remorse after trading all their rocket fuel to north korea for artillery shells...

[Frankie]

Uncle Sam eredeti hozzászólása:

Frankie eredeti hozzászólása:

What's the message.

Wood burns? Silly bastards.

Eh essentially this video, albeit without real people in the UK being atomized during the first few minutes of Mutually Assured Destruction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UMKcnuYt0

Either way the ones to be nuked first might be Germany, Italy & Japan. 2nd being UK, France, USA, Russia, Pakistan, Bharat (India), Israel, Iran, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, etc.

LOL with those factors maybe and perhaps the differences between being annihilated seconds later than another country is the difference between a soft-boiled egg and a hard-boiled egg.

All that matters is will we have have time for toast soldiers... :-/

[OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle]

qb eredeti hozzászólása:

OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle eredeti hozzászólása:

That also describes the same exact list of countries lol

i would imagine in europe its possible actually cause winters are kinda cold, but like in some places like africa you still can go outside in winter even if poor. i think its just combination of ♥♥♥♥♥ people with ♥♥♥♥♥ environment

Replace extreme cold with extreme heat in that case; it's functionally the same.


But my overall point is just that zero modern nations treat their poor with any consideration whatsoever. And here in the US, the wealth gap between the two people in your scenario would be like 1000x wider than it would in Russia.

[kingjames488]

idk why anyone needs to simulate a nuclear explosion in london... it'd only take like one modern MIRV ICBM to totally obliterate the entire island.

[Uncle Sam]

Frankie eredeti hozzászólása:

Uncle Sam eredeti hozzászólása:

Eh essentially this video, albeit without real people in the UK being atomized during the first few minutes of Mutually Assured Destruction:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_UMKcnuYt0

Either way the ones to be nuked first might be Germany, Italy & Japan. 2nd being UK, France, USA, Russia, Pakistan, Bharat (India), Israel, Iran, Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, etc.

LOL with those factors maybe and perhaps the differences between being annihilated seconds later than another country is the difference between a soft-boiled egg and a hard-boiled egg.

All that matters is will we have have time for toast soldiers... :-/

All things considered yes being nuked 1st or 2nd doesn't really matter due Mutually Assured Destruction, the only good part is hopefully maybe the very few unlucky enough to survive the post radiation world, should permanently ban nuclear weapons so humanity doesn't commit the same mistake twice.

[Othobrithol]

Watch it take two and a half years to get the fire started.

[OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle]

Uncle Sam eredeti hozzászólása:

so humanity doesn't commit the same mistake twice.

....that's extraordinarily optimistic, when has anything ever prevented us from doing that

[Frankie]

Uncle Sam eredeti hozzászólása:

Frankie eredeti hozzászólása:

LOL with those factors maybe and perhaps the differences between being annihilated seconds later than another country is the difference between a soft-boiled egg and a hard-boiled egg.

All that matters is will we have have time for toast soldiers... :-/

All things considered yes being nuked 1st or 2nd doesn't really matter due Mutually Assured Destruction, the only good part is hopefully maybe the very few unlucky enough to survive the post radiation world, should permanently ban nuclear weapons so humanity doesn't commit the same mistake twice.

In an ideal world perhaps we (mankind) could only but dream.

The 'types' that could and would survive in the sooper-dooper special allocated bunkers are the very 'types' that initiated the wars in the first place. You and me are (the) 'toast'

One could argue the concept of diminishing returns in this case I feel.

[qb]

OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle eredeti hozzászólása:

qb eredeti hozzászólása:

i would imagine in europe its possible actually cause winters are kinda cold, but like in some places like africa you still can go outside in winter even if poor. i think its just combination of ♥♥♥♥♥ people with ♥♥♥♥♥ environment

Replace extreme cold with extreme heat in that case; it's functionally the same.


But my overall point is just that zero modern nations treat their poor with any consideration whatsoever. And here in the US, the wealth gap between the two people in your scenario would be like 1000x wider than it would in Russia.

one of my friends is from that place, i think last time they checked the poor they were dead for like a year, so idk how wide the gap is there.

state of poorness is not just poor, but how much people care about them, or just people in general. cause you can have people in the same family hating on a family memeber who is poor just for thatreason they cant provide for themselves, even though there is virtually no way for them not be poor.

[vkobe]

Abaddon the Despoiler eredeti hozzászólása:

Can Russia afford that much plywood?

Don't they need to rebuild their navy?

https://thedefensepost.com/2023/12/19/ukraine-shahed-kamikaze-drone/

https://www.wisaplywood.com/wisawoodsat/

[FafnirChaos]

What a waste of money - They could have saved time and money by bombing one of their own cities at the beginning of the war and just put a sign up saying London - They got how many of their people killed over it.

[vkobe]

qb eredeti hozzászólása:

OoOoOoooOOoOoorgle eredeti hozzászólása:

That also describes the same exact list of countries lol

i would imagine in europe its possible actually cause winters are kinda cold, but like in some places like africa you still can go outside in winter even if poor. i think its just combination of ♥♥♥♥♥ people with ♥♥♥♥♥ environment

poor can still go outside in winter in artic area

for eternal summer countries it is in summer they suffer, example phoenix in august or miami when it is afternoon, especially with 99% humidity at 35 c