Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
missed the question uwu
I still have that chair I used since primary
Is ergonómico, but is quite old, I am surprised it still did not break 🤔
husband speaking facts uwu
I know there are those PC snobs who think they’re “too good” to use a controller, or the ones that believe that you’re supposed to use keyboard and mouse just because “you’re on PC, so that what you do”. But unless you’re extremely picky in your genre preferences, there will come a point where you’ll find some games that you will find more enjoyable / comfortable to play on an alternative device.
I think people can often underestimate how much a choice of control scheme can impact the way you perceive a game. And there is absolutely no logical reason to intentionally restrict yourself to one, singular method.
Not entirely true. First, higher framerates translate into more frequently updated game states even if you can't see the frames. This leads to more analogous input.
More importantly though you can get rather cheap high refresh rate monitors these days. Newegg has this 180hz Acer Nitro on sale for just $90[www.newegg.com], and an alternative listing for a different one.
Even at just 1080p it's quite hard to push 180 F.P.S. on the higher settings. A 4090 paired with a 7800x3D will only output 175 F.P.S. 135 in Hogwarts Legacy for example.[www.techspot.com]
Granted, I don't understand why you'd spend $1700 on a graphics card and $400 on a processor only to buy a $90 monitor ($150 full price). You're probably going to keep your monitor longer than your graphics card so it'd be wiser to just buy a 4080 super and buy an $800 monitor, but you can take full advantage of the best graphics cards on a cheap monitor.
It is kinda hard to play with your hands full of food or eat with your hands on the mouse and keyboard, and you're not getting up just to wash your hands so if you are eating snack foods with your hand, it it carries over food residue like cheeto/dorito dust. Unless you eat something like a banana or bother to get up to wash your hands in the middle of a boss fight.
It makes more sense to eat first, then play to free up your hands and minimize distractions. 'O course snacking can help make the loading times tolerable, so you win some, you lose some.
Surely you jest?
A good PC controller needs to support both xinput and directinput, and have good mapping software that allows mapping to keystrokes as well as autofire and macros.
anything not a razor.....still the most over rated brand in PC next to corsair.....
An overly expensive "gaming" mouse.
An overly expensive "gaming" keyboard.
An overly expensive headset. (Speakers master race.)
A second monitor.
RGB lighting.
An overwhelming sense of desire to throw my money at greedy companies making substandard products to take advantage of the word "gaming" that couldn't care less about you or your hobby.
Things I do have:
More skill than most other gamers, despite not having the "trendy" paraphernalia.