Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
1) she is horrible at interviews
2) cannot go longer than 40 mins or so
3) cannot go unscripted
BECAUSE of the above, it makes sense for her NOT to do the interview. If I were her campaign manager I would advise her NOT to do it as nothing can come from it.
1) The Rogan podcast is the biggest in the world.
2)That Trump interview now has 35M views, in less than a week. That's crazy.
3) Rogan's primary demographic are young adult men
4) Kamala is losing the demographic of young adult men (as per media, not me)
5) On the surface, it would make a great choice for her to mitigate some of those losses by appearing Rogan.
BUT, because of the facts above about her weaknesses at interviews, it would be a disaster for her. So she definitely shouldn't do it.
What she should have done from the beginning was arm herself with interview training. She was absent from all interviews and press for over a month in the beginning. Presumably because she was horribad at this (which later she proved was correct). She should have spent the time in hyper-training. She didn't. IF she had the skills, the Rogan interview could have been a boon. She failed to develop those skills, so it's a bane.
They knew for two years Joe was braindead. Shills on this site prefer a braindead puppet with a government ran by an unelected group of advisors.
Greg Foreman already has his take out on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Axgqv8QX_uA
It's actually not unusual.
Face it - Rogan's show isn't exactly prime campaign territory for Harris.
Plus, it's not "televised live." It's probably a "radio show" to them and, thus, easily capable of being done remotely.
Have you ever seen other interviews that weren't done in the studio where the broadcast was usually hosted? Even on television? Trump has done plenty of those. Was he "wanting special treatment?" Maybe we should put together a list of where he did interviews with interviewers while at on the road or not at the studio?
I think the Harris campaign just doesn't really give a crap about being on the Rogan show, to be honest. I don't see why they should, either.
But, that this is such a terrible "special treatment" request is just bogus whining. It's common, especially for traveling/campaigning politicians.
Kamala probably should of because Trump was able to speak to 38 million people in 4 days
Pretty sure TV doesn’t hit those numbers
https://youtu.be/hBMoPUAeLnY?si=0Et3nUVNomTFSK8G
Trump has the time because he's not currently in government.
Man is not well mentally. He's fading fast.
I'm not even a fan of the show, but I kind of wish they'd do it. Personally I think 3 hours is too long for such an interview, but I don't think Rogan would be especially hard on her. The fact neither want to travel for it doesn't strike me as particularly remarkable.
I'm inclined to believe you already realize you don't actually mean that.
Just so long as you respect my pronouns.