Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
SBI is the State bureau of investigation and I don´t really know why people talk about them in games.
Good question. Notice how the people who create these threads rarely actually answer that question. It's like making a thread saying a game "insists upon itself" (yes, I'm referencing Peter criticizing the Godfather in Family Guy) but without giving an explanation of how or why, only simply wanting to be "contrarian" so they can justify hating it for no reason.
They're a consultancy firm with less than 30 employees. Hell, game devs actually have to hire THEM in order for them to be involved. So no, they do NOT break or make a game. Plenty of games have failed for one reason or another, but being "woke" or having SBI involved wasn't one of them. And no, their involvement or lack thereof would NOT have saved the game if the money was already not being properly used.
Ways I see it, they're a "conspiracy dogwhistle and boogeyman" for people who already are inclined to have a bigoted or prejudiced view of minorities or any individuals they don't like, and "SBI Detected" and "woke" is just a veil to cover that bigotry. I mean, half the time, none of them even offer proof that SBI was actually involved in the game. They just simply slap it on the forums, and all the trolls come out of the woodwork.