Why do poor people have kids?

[76561199747665046]

[Mauserich]

Messaggio originale di Simp Slayer:

Having children is not a question of wealth, all humans have children. But not only all humans, but also all animals. So it's the most normal thing in the world. It's nature.

[Delta]

Because they want to carry on their bloodline but can't afford to.

[Under there]

because they are better suited to having children than you are.

[sleeps]

if the school or working system favors specific locations in some way or another, then it's by design.

a bit vague but if i remember correctly, at least in the us, the taxpayer money funds schools by area and the richer the place is, the better the school service is. im not sure if this is true or not, especially when it came from johnny harris himself.

[Top Cat]

OP Blocked, again.

The obsession with this and other similar threads is not right.

[smokerob79]

If you have touched a women in your life you understand why there are kids in the world.....you wont have this problem.......

[Goblin]

Love inherenting the debt of another person before I'm even an adult, which affects Fasfa for colleges.

this country will pay in another way for crippling access to education. You can say it already has, and it will continue to hemorrhage. Pseudoscience and conspiracies for everyone!!!

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

Messaggio originale di LilBlkCloud:

In my country, for example (Canada), you get PAID every month you have a kid, and the more kids you have, the more you get paid.

That's one reason.

Same in the usa.

[Tex]

The desire to have a family shouldn't have a financial barrier. That is completely unfair and immoral. Family is the cornerstone of being Human.

[Saturnalia]

Messaggio originale di LilBlkCloud:

In my country, for example (Canada), you get PAID every month you have a kid, and the more kids you have, the more you get paid.

That's one reason.

Does that apply to white people too?

[Dutchgamer1982]

we have a HUGE problem with declining population.. the birthrate in my nation the netherlands was already a diseaster at 1.7 a decade ago.. now it is only 1,4.... we need to get it back up to 2.1

people not getting kids while they could are an utter parasite to society!!

and yeah we do see that the more educated and wealthy people in a society get even less people than those at the lower end of the intellience and income scale..
(idiotcracy in action)

but at least they do their part..
so ask better why are those with the best genes not pumping out 10+ kids as they should!

a poor person with 5 kids.. does more to secure the future of their nation.. than a person with a phd and a billion euro income who pays millions in taxes...
for his society, language, culture, will DIE with him when that wealthy phd person dies..
but the poor person will keep the nation alive.

you cannot keep a nation alive with immigrants.
a nation is a group of people sharing one race, one faith, one language, and one culture...

migrants never will belong to that.. and are in a way detrimental to the continuation of the true nation.. even if they short term boost it's economy a bit in some cases.

so ask better why the heck are so many people NOT having kids.. and let their nation go extinct??

[Siluva]

Messaggio originale di WarHeRo:

Messaggio originale di Siluva:

Tell that to third world countries.

i have seen ppl live under bridges both in EU and USA. so ur statement is kinda invalid

World wide fertility maps disagrees.

[WarHeRo]

Messaggio originale di Siluva:

Messaggio originale di WarHeRo:

i have seen ppl live under bridges both in EU and USA. so ur statement is kinda invalid

World wide fertility maps disagrees.

u disagree with the notion that there are no poor people in wealthy nations? I’m not sure I understand ur argument.

if ur point is that economically disadvantaged people dont have children in developed countries, I’d have to respectfully disagree

while its true that families in less developed countries often have more children, that trend is typically influenced by factors such as women's roles in the workforce rather than purely economic status. its not simply a matter of poverty

[Not Big Surprise]

wha—

[Siluva]

Messaggio originale di WarHeRo:

Messaggio originale di Siluva:

World wide fertility maps disagrees.

u disagree with the notion that there are no poor people in wealthy nations? I’m not sure I understand ur argument.

if ur point is that economically disadvantaged people dont have children in developed countries, I’d have to respectfully disagree

while its true that families in less developed countries often have more children, that trend is typically influenced by factors such as women's roles in the workforce rather than purely economic status. its not simply a matter of poverty

I'm talking worlwide raw data.