Red Dead Redemption 1 costs 50$

[Tzyku]

How can a game from 2010 cost 50$? Its not even a remaster

[Dr. Weird]

Inflation.

[Lime]

It was ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ amazing, the quality of the experience doesn't diminish just because new games have been made, get over yourself and buy it if you haven't played it.

[ṼṏẌṏḭḊ]

Because of all the effort RockStar had to go to to add their launcher into the game.

[Lime]

Yeah I probably shouldn't encourage sales when that's specifically the reason I don't need to re-experience RDR1.

[Alliesaurus]

I never played the first one and I'm not that fussed about playing it now. It might be $50 but it ain't worth $50 of my money.

[Silverlight]

I will maybe get it on PC someday.

It is a very good game. I think better than the 2nd.(3rd I guess if you count Revolver)

[カイネ]

Severe greed, by one of the greediest companies around. Nothing new.

[Uncle Sam]

Originally posted by Tzyku:

How can a game from 2010 cost 50$? Its not even a remaster

Corpo being corpo, business as usual. If you really want to play that game wait for a decent sale.

[eram]

Red dead 2 on steam is cheaper than 1

[full of aura]

people buy that stuffs

[Aluvard]

Originally posted by Tzyku:

How can a game from 2010 cost 50$? Its not even a remaster

Take Two.

[Lime]

Originally posted by eram:

Red dead 2 on steam is cheaper than 1

I bet you're capable of providing a well thought out reason as to why, so why even make the comment?

[secuda]

You see when we "accepted" 70€ of a new game they allso raised the price of a remastered.

[Lime]

Originally posted by secuda:

You see when we "accepted" 70€ of a new game they allso raised the price of a remastered.

Qualitative pricing shouldn't be the object of scorn. They believe its a good product and if you don't you really don't even need to consider it. What you accept and what you don't won't stop the world from spinning.

[pants]

To make you not buy it on release