Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This "user's" review: https://steamcommunity.com/id/Liberteen90/recommended/1144200/
Now let's dissect what they say and when the review was left.
Okay. They apparently played it in the old days- they only have 9.2 hours on record. Posted on the 28th of November; they haven't played the game in the last 2 weeks.
Now it gets stranger. Look at their acheivements.
https://steamcommunity.com/id/Liberteen90/stats/1144200/?tab=achievements
They have none. It should be noted that one achievement is unlocked by arresting a civilian- something that has to be done in the very first mission, and that achievement was present in "the old days"
this is very clearly bot/bought reviews... will Steam do anything?
Instagram doesn't give you the option to buy likes, either. Don't be naive. These things exist- of course they're not Valve sponsored botnets, just as Instagram doesn't have Meta sponsored botnets for likes.
Would be really nice if I could buy a review or two -- lucrative means of earning awards indeed.
You don't find it weird that the negative reviews didn't scale like the positive reviews did, despite the game not receiving an update?
That wouldn't change the proportion of positive and negative reviews
On the 26th of November, the game had 59 reviews that day. 51:8 Positive:Negative
The very next day, 1,091 | 1,072:19
That's an increase 1,749% in total reviews. The positive reviews increased 2,002.0%, while the negative barely doubled. This is hardly a matter of opinion.
Then the next day, 1,830 reviews. 1,796:34. An increase of 67% in both positive reviews and total reviews from the last day. From the day before that, an increase of 3,001% in total reviews. 3,421% in positive reviews
This is very clearly the product of bot reviews.
Amazon deleted all of the negative reviews for almost 3 weeks after launch of The rings of power on their own company IMDB before they let some of them trough to make it seem more accurate.
House of dragons had a ton of positive reviews on accounts that where created the same day, had only one review and shared the same ip before they got rewritten to name a couple.
Which is part of the reason i skim the positive ones and only read the negatives properly.
If you want to view it that way, but the math says you're wrong. Either way, the game is objectively a scam. The AI, both friendly and enemy, BARELY functions- oftentimes the friendly AI will get themselves killed by doing things that are so indescribably stupid, costing you the mission. A prominent example is trying to arrest people while turning their backs to a doorway to a room which hasn't been cleared, with absolutely no way to stop them from restraining whoever it is they're going to arrest. No button, no stop, no freeze, no redirect- nothing. They just go and get themselves killed. That's game-breaking. They don't know how to reload shotguns- they need to be told what to do multiple times when doing an entry on doors- sometimes they just freeze on a joint entry and let one team push alone while they stare at a door. The game is a broken mess of jank.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcA7Nwa1L9I
Here's what's not in the game from what they showed:
Team size limited to 5
No FPV in the APC, or dismounting the APC
No PvP multiplayer at all
No server browser
No dedicated servers
No cohesive singleplayer story- only a progressive level selector with no story elements, choices, characters, etc.
No peeking doors to lob a grenade in
No drones
No sniper unit
No 9 bangs
No cutting the power to make NVG's useful
All enemies see perfectly in the dark anyways
No tactical ladders
No running with your gun readied
No incrementally changing speed
There's no velocity simulation- bullets have a pen number, and the environment has a pen number. If the bullet's pen number is bigger than the environments, it'll continue pen until it hits something that stops it- meaning nothing slows the bullets down.
Mathematically, there's actually more things that aren't in the game which they talked about, relative to things that are
Even if, you don't find it weird that they're reviewing a game that they don't have any achievements in, and haven't played a single time within the last two weeks? Really? That doesn't set off any alarm bells for you?
Don't underestimate the tech we have today
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh1850
https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator
That Reddit is comprised entirely of bots emulating users. If you had no idea, you wouldn't think twice
Odds are, if the accounts are genuine, it's people being paid or incentivized to loan their accounts for the review, or maybe even given keys for games in return for a positive review. Obviously I can't post links to these places, as it'll get the post flagged and censored, but you can easily search for these. Similar to the GTA website where the T isn't for theft
tbh after skimming through the pre-order trailer, I couldn't be ♥♥♥♥♥♥ to now go skim more comments, but you can feel free to. Just go to the graph, and click on the day where it spiked massively. Go look at the comments, and start opening reviews in new tabs, then go to their profiles and look for both hours played and achievements unlocked if you're really curious. It should be apparent.
Again, either way, the math doesn't support the proportional shift all of a sudden- it's incredibly bizarre, and imo, irrefutably indicative of nefarious bot use