Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So... No. Absolutely hate with a passion games which force you to have it on.
I get why people including me don't like motion blur in games but the IRL argument just doesn't work.
You just made a similar statement with the " left to right" , which is something you do irl.
What I wrote was more of a sarcastic metaphor.
Every. Single. Time.
Always first things to turn off in every game.
Motion blur, depth of field, chromatic aberration, vignette, film grain, lens flare they all get the boot.
It may decrease your frame-rate. And if you use an LCD-screen, you already have this effect by default. Sort of.
Regardless, I turn it on sometimes. Sometimes I make the graphics appear different to get some sort of experience from it. It honestly depends on the game-play, and whether or not you want graphics to appear even less "sharp" when in motion.
Sometimes the graphics are simplistic, and then making them less sharp could be beneficial. Because technically, it adds some sort of "fluidity" to the graphics that alters whatever you see depending on your (or an object's) movement. So you recieve an increased variety of still images your brain will have to process, would they have been still images, (which they technically still are). There's a creative use for it.
Better to have the option than not have it. You should just turn it on and off and experiment with it. It makes no sense to always turn it off by default, because then you are not testing it to see of it adds anything for you or not. Because technically, it does add something. Your graphic images will have a potential greater variety. So you essentially recieve more content, or at least a greater potential variety of images you would be able to process.
Nobody ever does them right, so off it goes.
Sarcasm doesn't work in text alone. Sarcasm requires vocal intonation for one. Text doesn't convey vocal tone. So, i say again, sarcasm in text alone does not work.
Sounds pretty obvious, although text can easily show sarcasm alone. But that is not related to the "motion blur" the OP was talking about.
I would love to hear your opinions about the matter.