Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
Yeah definitely depends on the leader or their role. If the supervisor is a project lead, then I guess the goal would be in regards to the project. I still think it's good to be a voice of your team though. If there are issues in meeting the goals of a project that the team are expressing, a good leader should inform the upper management. Or if the team has thought of a better way to accomplish the goal, the project lead should make those opinions known and try to implement them.
Maybe I've just had really bad supervisors, but most of my supervisors have always taken more of a "dictatorial" approach where it's "my way or the highway", which tends to stifle innovation.
Ok, so we're talking about a manager/supervisor. That is a leadership role but they aren't leaders as such. The goal is given and your job is to reach that goal, monitor progress, identify issues and so on.
Being wise with that power is the last step, often forgotten.
-> who is wise enough to chance this in a meritcracy or democracy or a handpicked noble succesor to prevent the next ruler to be an absolute tyran (for the best goverment is a noble dictator.. but the worst is a bad dictator... and it's hard to regulate which one you'll get.
his traits be a VERY devout christian.. following all Gods laws to the letter..
utterly loyal to his OWN people.. and will put their interest always first.. never ever willing to sell them out for his own interest.. but rather suffer himself so his people may florish.
basicly the ideal leader is the eternal kingship of Jesus Crist Himself.
and if it has to be a mortal man.. a christian-national-sociatist person.. so somebody who has a healthy nationalism for his own nation... while also being a true christian in both personal believe, live and his policies...
(basicly a christian king david.. or a christian judge (of old israel)
jean chretien for my country
jacque chirac for france
kroutchev or breznev for russia
jean paul 2 for vatican
deng xiaoping for john china
rocket man for north korea
katami for iran
ytzak rabin for israel
promise kurds and armenians their own nation if they help him rise to power.. than go genocide those armenians.. and deny they ever did that despite everybody knowing the armenian genocide is real.. and denying kurds their own land and supressing their rights till this day..
thats a crap leader!
Don't forget that your job is to balance the needs and expectations of both the workforce and the company directors. There always will be opportunities for both.
To hell with courtesy and motivation. If they don't work, force them. Kick them out if you have to, but achieve that goal at all cost.
... Yeah worker hate this manager with all their heart, me included. But he always have spectacular evaluation and loved by the higher up so he's probably the best.