All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
THE LORD Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:37am
Russia allegedly used an ICBM against ukraine.
Is the warhead carrying nukes?
Last edited by THE LORD; Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:42am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 49 comments
Dr. Weird Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:41am 
Why would they use an intercontinental ballistic missile on a country that's just next door? Why not just fire an artillery piece?
THE LORD Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:43am 
Originally posted by GigaChud:
Why would they use an intercontinental ballistic missile on a country that's just next door? Why not just fire an artillery piece?
Putin wants to let biden and zelensky know that his missile is larger than theirs combined.

Once again, another lame russian attempt to scare ukraine and the west into submission.
pants Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:44am 
Originally posted by GigaChud:
Why would they use an intercontinental ballistic missile on a country that's just next door? Why not just fire an artillery piece?
Because ICBMs are scary and intimidating, but more importantly, nobody cares about making sense anymore.

Edit: conventionally armed, fired in a high lob from 1000km away, honestly kind of bizarre
Last edited by pants; Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:45am
C4Warr10r Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:45am 
I haven't heard of this, but I guarantee you it did not carry a nuclear warhead. Russia doesn't DARE use even a single nuke. If it does, the entire world will turn against it , with the possible exceptions of Iran and North Korea, and that will be the end of Russia for the foreseeable future.

Putin is a lot of things, including ruthless, but he's still a Russian patriot of the Soviet variety. He won't destroy his own country just to burn the land and resources he wants in nuclear fire.
Ulfrinn Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:56am 
ICBMs are huge. They carry a massive payload that can take out large sections of a city. Russia has a lot of them. They don't actually need nukes to level Ukrainian cities. And the fact they've had them this whole time, and lots of them, with some being the size of a barn silo, they've been holding back a lot on Ukraine. Which they may not be doing anymore.
lmao, bit over kill to fire a ICBM just a few hundred kilometers away. Guess he's running out of the cheap stuff to fling over the border now. zzzz

Nice cool way to waste $50 million though
pants Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:57am 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
ICBMs are huge. They carry a massive payload that can take out large sections of a city. Russia has a lot of them. They don't actually need nukes to level Ukrainian cities. And the fact they've had them this whole time, and lots of them, with some being the size of a barn silo, they've been holding back a lot on Ukraine. Which they may not be doing anymore.
wouldn't be the first warcrime the world has sat and gone "no please don't do that" to
Dr. Weird Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:58am 
A global thermonuclear war that annihilates all of humanity would be a mercy that God would never allow.
Ulfrinn Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:00am 
Originally posted by whoa there:
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
ICBMs are huge. They carry a massive payload that can take out large sections of a city. Russia has a lot of them. They don't actually need nukes to level Ukrainian cities. And the fact they've had them this whole time, and lots of them, with some being the size of a barn silo, they've been holding back a lot on Ukraine. Which they may not be doing anymore.
wouldn't be the first warcrime the world has sat and gone "no please don't do that" to

And it wouldn't be the first someone someone made emotional accusations of war crimes without understanding what a war crime actually is as they seem to believe it's any act of warfare.
THE LORD Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:01am 
Originally posted by ✡︎sprut✡(they/them)✡.il:
lmao, bit over kill to fire a ICBM just a few hundred kilometers away. Guess he's running out of the cheap stuff to fling over the border now. zzzz

Nice cool way to waste $50 million though
Russian military has been wasting all sorts of equipment and russian lives throughout the war. So it's not surprising.
AdahnGorion Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:02am 
Originally posted by C4Warr10r:
I haven't heard of this, but I guarantee you it did not carry a nuclear warhead. Russia doesn't DARE use even a single nuke. If it does, the entire world will turn against it , with the possible exceptions of Iran and North Korea, and that will be the end of Russia for the foreseeable future.

Putin is a lot of things, including ruthless, but he's still a Russian patriot of the Soviet variety. He won't destroy his own country just to burn the land and resources he wants in nuclear fire.
Most of Putins family (children) live in western/central Europe and are married to very wealthy people from those countries... if you look closely at most elites they do this.... Putin does not have an interest in mass scale war, the Ukrainian war is a trade proxy war....

It will be over next year.
The Middle Eastern will be in focus and that proxy war will take much longer
maquina Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:02am 
No it's not a nuclear payload. It's a pronoun payload, the missiles have pronouns and estrogen in them and are going to woke-ify the Ukrainian population. Wokelear fallout if you will

I have this on very good authority from legitimate sources
pants Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:05am 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
Originally posted by whoa there:
wouldn't be the first warcrime the world has sat and gone "no please don't do that" to

And it wouldn't be the first someone someone made emotional accusations of war crimes without understanding what a war crime actually is as they seem to believe it's any act of warfare.
The indiscriminate targeting of a civilian population, for example, "leveling a city" to borrow your words, is a war crime under international law and established norms. There's nothing emotional about it, it just is.
Last edited by pants; Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:05am
Pocahawtness Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:08am 
I honestly don't see the point in posting this stuff. It doesn't matter what Russia does. It will do it anyway, and us worrying about changes nothing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqwIifgs7KU
th1 Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:17am 
Originally posted by Ulfrinn:
ICBMs are huge. They carry a massive payload that can take out large sections of a city. Russia has a lot of them. They don't actually need nukes to level Ukrainian cities. And the fact they've had them this whole time, and lots of them, with some being the size of a barn silo, they've been holding back a lot on Ukraine. Which they may not be doing anymore.

ICBMs are so inaccurate that with inert warheads, I'd be surprised if the attack did any more damage than if they had just launched six Iskanders.
Last edited by th1; Nov 21, 2024 @ 2:28am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 49 comments
Per page: 1530 50

All Discussions > Steam Forums > Off Topic > Topic Details
Date Posted: Nov 21, 2024 @ 1:37am
Posts: 49