安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
If you have no desire for human contact then might I suggest a pet to keep you from being lonely.
Trust me, I'm quite shy and I really don't have a lot of friends in real life, but it's still very good to talk to people.
So, is it safe to live alone? Yes. Is it good for you? Not really. By nature we're social creatures after all. I think if you found some good friends and kept them close you'd be better off. You need some degree of social skills today anyway, if you want to have a job. Even if the job doesn't have you talking to other people, you need to be able to interact with your co-workers to a certain extent.
Spending the week alone at home in 2015 is very different then it was in 1990 and I dont think those who 'study' socialization take this into account.
SPOILER!
He dies at the end
I think that is a myth.
I think by nature we are 'input feedback' creatures. Its just that prior to the electronic age the only way to get a good feedback loop based on your inputs is socialization. Now however you can get that from computers.
Source:
That's a very good point, actually.
needing a job in order to have money so that you can be isolated is not evidence that human beings are biologically in need of each other.
There are people who never have to work in their life, are the biologically different? no they are economically different. It has to be a reason that is intrinsic to being physically a human
awesome!
this is why I think most if not all our studies on human various conditions should be re-evaluated with technology in mind but also do do that evaluation 'correctly' so to speak.
One could go out and proove that technology has made us less social and leave the assumption that its a bad thing and not do a study how is there a positive (or rather 'non-negitive') reason for it.
Living there is difficult due to the prices of necessities:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-o0Lp6wS_kw4/UA1pv-S3g5I/AAAAAAAACMY/y5bXc_IK0pQ/s1600/DSCN0156.JPG
https://i0.wp.com/www.heelsfirsttravel.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/SAM_0748-456x500.jpg?resize=456%2C500
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-V8QAZ6dAvrg/UA1p0e629oI/AAAAAAAACMg/tIoOVgAIDow/s1600/DSCN0152.JPG
www.alaskadispatch.com/sites/default/files/images/topic/news/nome-gas-4904.jpg
http://www.adn.com/sites/default/files/images/topic/news/nome-gas-4904.jpg
If your planning to live rural there, the crime rate's high, your neighbors will be very far from you, the winters are extremely brutal, wildlife can be hostile, and you'll be screwed if you hurt yourself and you have no way to contact someone.
I occasionally think about doing this, then realise that I couldn't be able to stand the isolation. I need to talk with people.
I've heard studies that claim your life span is significantly reduced if you have no contact with other people. But I'll leave the validity of that up to you.
Sure you could argue that we have things like TV and the internet now too, but that's not real interaction.
If you really plan on going through with it get a dog. They're probably the next best thing to a person.