Sweet Eyes grills the Head of the Secret Service

[989]

https://rumble.com/v57zm6z-nancy-mace-a.k.a.-sweet-eyes-questions-the-head-of-the-secret-service.html

[Talby]

Sadly typical with the corruption of the current administration...

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

It's always the Praetorians...

[Ray Rook]

Damn, roasted her for sure. Nothing will come of it though.

[Groogo]

That was fun.

[Masque]

The Ongoing Investigation Gambit that our agencies use in Congressional hearings, court cases, etc. to avoid answering questions needs to be removed as an option for them, legislatively.

It's getting old, really fast. Like everyone who uses it is laughing inside. "Haha suckers! Everything we do is an ongoing investigation, you fools! We'll never have to answer another question for the rest of time! GWA-HA-HA!!!"

[Morkonan]

989 původně napsal:

https://rumble.com/v57zm6z-nancy-mace-a.k.a.-sweet-eyes-questions-the-head-of-the-secret-service.html

This smacks of grandstanding.

A hint: When someone asks you to tell the truth and then tells you that you must limit your responses, they're not really asking you to tell the truth...

If they are evasive, that's one thing. If you start out saying "I will only accept the answers I want" that's another.

"Have you stopped assassinating kittens? YES OR NO!"

It's a setup for a play being carried out in front of the cameras.

That's why these sorts of hearings tick me off so much - I don't care if anyone's constituents votes for them in the next election - I want serious questions that allow for complex responses.

[Tonepoet]

Are these loaded questions designed to make her look bad no matter how she answers?

Yes, or yes?

Plus there might be considerations of confidentiality at play.

[Morkonan]

Tonepoet původně napsal:

Are these loaded questions designed to make her look bad no matter how she answers?

Yes, or yes?

You need to load those statements with some expletives to increase their impact and give the illusion of sincerity.

Also, have you stopped lying, yet?

:)

[Crawl]

Another in the long list of Biden appointees who are complete failures because they were hired to check identity boxes rather than for their qualifications.

[abcd]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. původně napsal:

It's always the Praetorians...

well y'know, the Praetorians had decades where they were well-funded and well trained and could reasonably expect to protect an important senator from rival senators' private armies.

these decades are typically followed by the senators agreeing to defund the guard, as the inability to assassinate eachother over trivial issues was turning the senate into a gridlock.

meanwhile if they simply respected eachother's capitalistic influences vis-a-vis mercenary potentiate the poorer aristocrats would back down when pressed by these titants of rome.

Caesar's usage of the praetorians and the proletari head was a political move which highlighted these realities and allied both the populus as well as the aristocracy behind him against the ruling powers. a move allowed by the simultaneous ban on private armies and the removal of public defense positions; just the previous year people had stormed the proletari with clubs, fueled by low silver, to attempt a coup on the senate using the position's power.

the triumverate developed out of a 'return to normal' power sharing agreement, once the 'problem senators' had been successfully assassinated by a legal deployment of the guard.

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

I love how much of a rat she was trying to answer with a word-salad to simple 'yes or no' questions lol. Imagine saying "Yes, this was a colossal failure" but wont resign lol.

[abcd]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. původně napsal:

I love how much of a rat she was trying to answer with a word-salad to simple 'yes or no' questions lol. Imagine saying "Yes, this was a colossal failure" but wont resign lol.

I wouldn't resign to support someone's fake assassination. Might make me construable as an accessory.

[Sir Seanicus, Esq.]

abcd původně napsal:

Sir Seanicus, Esq. původně napsal:

I love how much of a rat she was trying to answer with a word-salad to simple 'yes or no' questions lol. Imagine saying "Yes, this was a colossal failure" but wont resign lol.

I wouldn't resign to support someone's fake assassination. Might make me construable as an accessory.

"The buck stops with me!"

Of course, a bureaucrat AND a hypocrite.

[abcd]

Sir Seanicus, Esq. původně napsal:

abcd původně napsal:

I wouldn't resign to support someone's fake assassination. Might make me construable as an accessory.

"The buck stops with me!"

Of course, a bureaucrat AND a hypocrite.

It's what you're supposed to do when you know an assassination is fake, you're in a position of authority in regards to allowing it and/or a real one, and are being asked to take the blame for allowing a fake and/or real one to happen.

Typical middle management position. Just assert your authority and competence and move on; you had nothing to do with any of the decisions made that caused this crisis.

[989]

Ray Rook původně napsal:

Damn, roasted her for sure. Nothing will come of it though.

She quit today; surprisingly. O_O

I guess all the backlash and negative press the "left" is getting pressured them to force her out. Usually they wouldn't have cared, and kept on with their deep state corruption.

But the election is coming up soon, and they had to do something, because more and more people are waking up, and seeing what's going on. 🙏🏻