Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
on the ground floor with ground floor people
we dont worry about what the above think...
Better discussion would be, should there be a limit on greed? is it ethically and morally fair to have billions on your bank account while the majority of people have to survive with the small left overs? Should we put an end to the system that enables the 1% having 99% of all the wealth (and thus power) in the world?
you owe me.
Even if paper money and coins are gone, people will still trade for goods and services. Any given goods or service, is also going to beget Nominal Value, too.
As long as people are willing to aknowledge a "price" upon something, then "money" is always going to be circulating, for buying and selling.
together for the greater good of the village.. everyone plays the part they can
play in food farming and the other social dynamic needed in a village community
I can't eat Jesus.
However, since the erasure of the gold standard, the value for many Westerners is credit. not goods.
So in a world w/o money we would immediately see a societal upheaval because the relative value of each individual would drop without that debt.
Money is actually the stop-gap keeping most people alive rn.
stand back...
wullah..