Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
I would argue that greed and survival are not the same thing though. I can see how we might conflate them however, since they're both mildly entangled.
You can reach a point where survival doesn't require any more greed.
I think more than anything that removing money from the world or the desire for money from people would result in humans not being human.
Life is weird when you overthink it.
I did see that. My response was to what I initially read though so I'ma just leave it there.
Appreciate the input though; I always value viewpoints beyond my own, assuming they're presented respectfully. You're usually pretty on point with the respect so your take is always welcome.
Let's say you own a cow and want a new shirt.
But the guy offering a shirt wants 10 chickens.
Now you'll have to find a guy who offers chickens for cows
You might find a farmer who owns chickens, but he's offering 30 chickens per cow. You don't need that many chickens and can't raise them. But you're forced to take it because you really wanted that shirt.
So you either take the loss by saying you'll only take 10 chickens, or you take all 30 chickens and exchange 10 for the shirt, then be left with 20 chickens you didn't want.
If this sounds inefficient, that's because it is.
Housing will be treated as a need instead of a business, same as food and water. Jobs won't be based on the income of families, instead everyone would get equal opportunity to go to the same schools and universities and the level of job you get will be based on work put in and capability.
you work in the armed forces or on a oil rig or ship at sea or in space
you dont need money as such as you have everything you need to
get the job done each day....
the added bonus... things are not limited to a budget which would accelerate everything
For example: 30 hours total spent assisting the elderly in a rest-home will enable you to pick up an upgrade/add-on to the standardised computers such as a storage expansion card.
Or lets say you created a game as a game developer, well if the game is a success, you get a bonus added on top of the hours you put in developing the game which will enable you to either attend a nicer restaurant or maybe upgrade your home cinema system.
Of course, by far the greatest period of evolution. The money period is only a fraction of a percent of that.
Wow ... someone said what I thought immediately.
The problem with the barter system is having something worth being traded of equal value.
It would force the elites, i.e. rich people, to lose power. I doubt they would want to let that happen.
I do tend to believe that if everyone had the exact same amount of money there would be a serious lack of work issue.
A lot of people would have to change their mindset on how then new system would work and I don't think that would work out well for those with a ton of money right now. It would also force them to see people they normally look down upon to see as equals.
In the short term I don't see it working well. Once they are forced to realize that they are equals to everyone else then that may change.
The characters aboard the enterprise are arrogant and ravenous for status and acclaim and go out of their way to achieve it.
If you failed under capitalism, you'd likely fail worse under Trek.