Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
One thing I've learned over the years, nobody ever sells themselves that hard without having something to hide. Mr. Beast's just the latest.
"On the next episode of TMZ's 'Where Are They Now?' documentary series, meet the 10 thousand orphans that were adopted by Mr. Beast and hear how the Youtube philanthropist changed their lives."
he seems legit, he doesn't really have anything to gain from this especially from critiquing one of the biggest creators on the platform, if anything he willingly put a target on his back but he didn't actually reveal anything that was classified and sensitive information. uwu
The information's sourced from the guy who worked for Mr. Beast since the early days. Plus, you don't get shadowbanned by YouTube unless you've hit a little too close to home.
If they followed through with their threat with a civil case based on slander/libel and it was dismissed because the Judge found the statements "true," the repercussions for Beat&Co would be monstrous...
But, if thee accusations were not allowed and they could prove malice on the part of Dogpack, he might be in some financial trouble.
I doubt it would be taken that far, but they've chosen to get formal with this and now there's legalese involved - Dogpack needs a good attorney to navigate this. If he goes about this on his own, he's got an idiot for a client...
https://www.reddit.com/r/mrbeastsnark/comments/1egx8d8/mrbeast_sends_cease_and_desist_letter_to/
This is only part of the letter, IIRC.
But, there is mention of an NDA.
For criminal activities being reported, such as the "lottery" and "sweepstakes" violations, he may have some protection from an NDA.
But... he's trod over a lot of NDA things that may not have much to do with illegal activities. In short, he's painted those illegal activities in high relief, but with too broad a brush...
I think that, if pursued, he'd be extremely lucky to escape all the violations of his NDA in a civil suit. Mr. Beast can still end up being investigated, prosecuted, and found guilty of breaking the law even while Dogpack is sued into oblivion for breaking his NDA... Now, as far as "damages," I'd think that it'd be difficult for Mr. Beast to claim that the damages they incurred due to the breaking of the NDA weren't actually due to their own illegal activity. Still, I think they'd win "something" from a suit eve if Mr. Beast was found guilty.
I am not an attorney. This isn't legal advice. If anyone thinks this is legal advice, they should double-check the dosage level of their prescription meds with their physician...
Now these same people are taking pleasure in wanting to destroy this big youtuber, this sadistic desire to break a popular person, the others who make videos on the subject like vultures to make as much money as possible.
No, there's no soul, it's the most bestial emptiness, it reminds me of the story of a pokemon fan who literally had a youtube channel dedicated to his harassment, although I despise this person, I mostly felt a great disgust at the dedication that people have to do harm.
Back to reality.
not entirely
if it was false and has affected the brand it can be seen as slander which you can take action for uwu
Have you seen those youtube video ads that claim that drinking warm water at night will cure diabetes?
I imagine it'll still be a few months before some regulatory agency catches up with them. But, they will prosecute them based not on what some person may interpret, but based upon what they claim in their advertising.
There is plenty of video evidence of what appears to document Mr. Beast running illegal sweepstakes and changing the rules in the middle of the giveaway. There's plenty of video footage showing him altering a contest in order to pick a winner to give a large monetary prize.
These aren't interpreted as "fiction" by the audience. They are presented as contests and live programming, many times acting as inducements for people to call in and give Mr. Beast money for a "chance to win" that... does not really exist.
That's Fraud.
Regardless of what happens to DogPack, there's enough evidence of issues here to fuel at least a serious criminal investigation of Mr. Beast's practices.