MAPs, pedo support on Valve side and a tale of euphemisms

[reallyHelp]

I reported an ongoing activity running for 18 hours here on Steam forums which indicates a MAP (Minor Attracted Person, washing euphemism for pedo) operating their disgusting activities. Three hours laters no action was taken by Steam support so I decided to call for help on a populated thread I happen to know. I just made a single post, not even linking the disgusting thread, pointing directions people could find and report said CRIMINAL activity.

1. I got shocked by the reactions at that second 'community', which resulted on a report on MY post.

2. I can't calculate the precise timing, anyway I received 'A warning from a member of Steam Support', which deleted my post under allegations of 'spamming'. By *a single post made in a forum*.

3. I went off to that second 'community' once again to politely express my full disbelief on what was happening. For some intuition I decided to check for any development a few minutes later, just to discover my second post was silently deleted while the original offending thread is there, no actions taken against it in any shape or form.

So my only conclusion here is: MAP, ie, PEDO activity is also a tolerated thing on Valve forums too!

I'm taking screenshots and notes on everything, I happen to know some influencers on various degrees of the industry, I'm seriously concerned on what the PRESENT is already hiding from those who ignore how deep we already descended as a society.

I'm shocked. I'm really shocked.

EDIT:
I made a longish update on the situation, 24 hours after my first report being made to Steam support, still being ignored. Check it out here:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/4511002742437757912/?ctp=4#c4511002742440959936

[Dracoco OwO]

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Автор сообщения: davidb11

Yeah, it works well now.
Tweaking the quotes would also be a good idea.

I just have too much experience with how social media and others block people. LOL.

Social media =/= Forums. Forums don't work like that, for the most part. But yeah it reads like kingjames would be happy with the ability to just not see what a blocked user is saying, not block them from posting altogether.


Outside of quotes, though. I see no logic behind blocking someone, then clicking their content to see what they say. People need more self control.

This is why i don't block peoples unless absolutely necessesary, not even you in fact.

[ุ]

Автор сообщения: Dracoco OwO

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Social media =/= Forums. Forums don't work like that, for the most part. But yeah it reads like kingjames would be happy with the ability to just not see what a blocked user is saying, not block them from posting altogether.


Outside of quotes, though. I see no logic behind blocking someone, then clicking their content to see what they say. People need more self control.

This is why i don't block peoples unless absolutely necessesary, not even you in fact.

Feel free, I'm unbothered either way.

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Dracoco OwO

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Social media =/= Forums. Forums don't work like that, for the most part. But yeah it reads like kingjames would be happy with the ability to just not see what a blocked user is saying, not block them from posting altogether.


Outside of quotes, though. I see no logic behind blocking someone, then clicking their content to see what they say. People need more self control.

This is why i don't block peoples unless absolutely necessesary, not even you in fact.

Yeah. I don't try to block people like it's my job.
I only do it to people I know have no redeeming qualities and are just there to cause trouble.

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Alice Liddell

Report, report, report. Me and Valve got one pedo group off Steam so they do not allow it but they must investigate it fully.

Автор сообщения: King of Games

if youre not just trolling, then feel free to leave a tip to the FBI on their website

The FBI is watching.

Yeah, but the FBI would also tell the OP that femboys are not against the law. :P
Apparently the thread was about femboys or something, that he hated.

[kingjames488]

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Автор сообщения: kingjames488

should change how the whole thing works so you can reasonably block people IMO... maybe then people wouldn't feel like they're being harassed on steam so much.

And by reasonably block, you just mean not seeing their posts, not preventing them from posting, say even on a topic you made, correct?

ofc.

this seems to be something people get confused with when I talk about this, but when I'm talking about blocking people I'm talking about personally not seeing posts/comments/w.e, not limiting their ability to post(other than maybe on your profile, since that also doesn't seem to be included in a block...)

I honestly thought this is what everyone thought "blocking someone" was... I'm just old I guess.

[Dracoco OwO]

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Автор сообщения: Dracoco OwO

This is why i don't block peoples unless absolutely necessesary, not even you in fact.

Feel free, I'm unbothered either way.

Nah man i don't take that stuff personally i can get that peoples get upset at stuff sometimes it's no biggie.

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: kingjames488

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

And by reasonably block, you just mean not seeing their posts, not preventing them from posting, say even on a topic you made, correct?

ofc.

this seems to be something people get confused with when I talk about this, but when I'm talking about blocking people I'm talking about personally not seeing posts/comments/w.e, not limiting their ability to post(other than maybe on your profile, since that also doesn't seem to be included in a block...)

I honestly thought this is what everyone thought "blocking someone" was... I'm just old I guess.

See, that's why I kind of like you.
You're not a bad guy.

Your view is basically how I wouldn't mind the system working.

[ุ]

Автор сообщения: kingjames488

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

And by reasonably block, you just mean not seeing their posts, not preventing them from posting, say even on a topic you made, correct?

ofc.

this seems to be something people get confused with when I talk about this, but when I'm talking about blocking people I'm talking about personally not seeing posts/comments/w.e, not limiting their ability to post(other than maybe on your profile, since that also doesn't seem to be included in a block...)

I honestly thought this is what everyone thought "blocking someone" was... I'm just old I guess.

Yeah even on forums, a lot of the time at most it'll do "post by blocked user" and won't let you open the message.

So you're not wrong. And I'm glad we could come to the clarification, hopefully it'll help people judge on proper information.

A lot of people judging you on your issue with blocking, are likely acting in a reactionary faction because a LOT of people who complain about the current block system. Just want a means to keep people from posting on topics they deem THEIRS (which, once a topic is submitted to the forum, it becomes available for use for ALL. Not content that 'belongs' to the OP)

Personally I've seen a few known trolls who want to be able to stop people from posting, because these trolls name and profile change to try to hide when they make new bait topics. And they don't like getting recognized by regs who know them.

So people can be a little jumpy when reacting to people wanting changes in how blocking works, y'know?

[76561199572171423]

i bet it was this thread
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/4511002532255187715/

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Автор сообщения: kingjames488

ofc.

this seems to be something people get confused with when I talk about this, but when I'm talking about blocking people I'm talking about personally not seeing posts/comments/w.e, not limiting their ability to post(other than maybe on your profile, since that also doesn't seem to be included in a block...)

I honestly thought this is what everyone thought "blocking someone" was... I'm just old I guess.

Yeah even on forums, a lot of the time at most it'll do "post by blocked user" and won't let you open the message.

So you're not wrong. And I'm glad we could come to the clarification, hopefully it'll help people judge on proper information.

A lot of people judging you on your issue with blocking, are likely acting in a reactionary faction because a LOT of people who complain about the current block system. Just want a means to keep people from posting on topics they deem THEIRS (which, once a topic is submitted to the forum, it becomes available for use for ALL. Not content that 'belongs' to the OP)

Personally I've seen a few known trolls who want to be able to stop people from posting, because these trolls name and profile change to try to hide when they make new bait topics. And they don't like getting recognized by regs who know them.

So people can be a little jumpy when reacting to people wanting changes in how blocking works, y'know?

Yep. Exactly.
THat's why I am jumpy too.
Because I have experience with those types of people.
The ones who want to shut down all opposing view points.

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Will Smith

i bet it was this thread
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/12/4511002532255187715/

Oh, well, let's hope not.
LOL.

[ุ]

Автор сообщения: davidb11

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Yeah even on forums, a lot of the time at most it'll do "post by blocked user" and won't let you open the message.

So you're not wrong. And I'm glad we could come to the clarification, hopefully it'll help people judge on proper information.

A lot of people judging you on your issue with blocking, are likely acting in a reactionary faction because a LOT of people who complain about the current block system. Just want a means to keep people from posting on topics they deem THEIRS (which, once a topic is submitted to the forum, it becomes available for use for ALL. Not content that 'belongs' to the OP)

Personally I've seen a few known trolls who want to be able to stop people from posting, because these trolls name and profile change to try to hide when they make new bait topics. And they don't like getting recognized by regs who know them.

So people can be a little jumpy when reacting to people wanting changes in how blocking works, y'know?

Yep. Exactly.
THat's why I am jumpy too.
Because I have experience with those types of people.
The ones who want to shut down all opposing view points.

There's one in the BG3 forums who hates me because he sockpuppets across 3 accounts to try and post misinformation and sarcastic hateful content about the LGBT+, he calls me a stalker because I just point out the name(s) he's known under so the other regs know it's him.

He absolutely loathes me.

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Автор сообщения: davidb11

Yep. Exactly.
THat's why I am jumpy too.
Because I have experience with those types of people.
The ones who want to shut down all opposing view points.

There's one in the BG3 forums who hates me because he sockpuppets across 3 accounts to try and post misinformation and sarcastic hateful content about the LGBT+, he calls me a stalker because I just point out the name(s) he's known under so the other regs know it's him.

He absolutely loathes me.

Heh.
PEople like that are so weird.

[Talby]

Автор сообщения: Dracoco OwO

Автор сообщения: Leonardo Da Pinchi

Then there's Cuties, a French film.

Child exploitation and borderline sexualizing isn't new, and it's a global issue.

As a French i am completely repulsed by this ♥♥♥♥ or whatever happenned in Paris olympics opening with the little girl and the Dragqueens again.

Agree, however as i see it, it completely backfired - by mocking Christianity, they are just reinforcing the values it represents despite the memory hole the last few decades of education tried to enforce, now people are searching Google about "the last supper" 🤦‍♀️ 🤦‍♂️🤦

Reminds me of this scene:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v7JaStGH-AQ

[davidb11]

Автор сообщения: Talby

Автор сообщения: Dracoco OwO

As a French i am completely repulsed by this ♥♥♥♥ or whatever happenned in Paris olympics opening with the little girl and the Dragqueens again.

Agree, however as i see it, it completely backfired - by mocking Christianity, they are just reinforcing the values it represents despite the memory hole the last few decades of education tried to enforce, now people are searching Google about "the last supper" 🤦‍♀️ 🤦‍♂️🤦

Reminds me of this scene:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v7JaStGH-AQ

What are you even referring to here?
I don't understand what mocking Christianity has to do with anything quoted.
Also, what is a memory hole, and why would education try to reinforce it?