Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
when's the last time you looked at 14,000 photos of guns in a single google images session? before settling on the AR-15 you already have.
He was a registered Republican.
Therefore "a Republican."
If we're talking about personal behavior and online social interactions being the defining traits for someone's political affiliation, instead, then many so-called "Republicans" are not actually conservatives or traditional "Republicans," but are Fascists and other, less savory, terms. But, we don't have any other powerful political parties dedicated to those ideals, so...
And, I used to be a "Republican." Now, I'm just a "Fiscal Conservative." What I am not, however, is a fascist, totalitarian, misogynistic, wacko. While that could be just about anyone of any political affiliation, those seem to gravitate to one side of the line these days. I don't know if there is a party-registration card for those sorts.
As far as the shooter, it appears he really just wanted his name in the history books. He was probably more inspired by the school's "Shooting Club" refusing him for unsafe practices and unskilled performance, or whatever. So, I guess maybe he decided to show them what he could do? Dunno, data is still unfolding.
bots don't have motivations for their searches, and a motiveless shooter raises fewer questions. especially when they're declared dead.
luckily there's no charges for anyone to press, so there's no need for habeus corpus.
To anyone except OT users, it seems.
if he had a motive it would be easier to craft a narrative where he was real
Well, I wasn't going to post the entire article that OP may or may not have actually read.
That being said he clearly was an idiot since he failed to kill Trump despite having the perfect line of sight and not being that far from Trump all things considered, a shot Trump was clearly lucky to survive but i blame the shooter mainly for sucking with a firearm, because at this point that's not bad luck that's incompetence.
Police found him and were climbing up the roof I heard. So he was under pressure.
Kinda contradicts the other narratives though.
Dude should have taken drugs at this point probably anyways.
Well you see, the secret service has certain rules of engagement.
Except the snipers were 'police' and pointed right at him already.
Idk maybe they weren't actually police, or secret service. Maybe they were just actors.