Trump shooter, Thomas Crooks, social media posts, not Republican

[joco]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673423/social-media-post-trump-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-ceo.html

"He posted on the site nine (9) times total... While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden."

[Michael]

Affronter a écrit :

Turns out the Orange Trumptard was never hit by a bullet.

Debunked
https://youtu.be/H6Hx1cpSjDY

[Hammer Of Evil]

democrats everywhere trying to walk it back, local republicans not having it, film at 11.

[Pierce Dalton]

Nargo a écrit :

Pierce Dalton a écrit :

I wonder how much they paid this guy to say this. Probably not much

Interestingly, his other classmates described him as a quiet kid that wouldn't talk to anyone, let alone express political opinion.

Everyone who shatters your narrative is totally a paid agent bro

I don't have a narrative, but if someone is saying the opposite of all his other classmates... that's a bit sus to say the least. Also, it's FOX, bro

[Masque]

Pierce it's a well known truism that if cops gather up five suspects or witnesses and interrogate them all separately, and all five stories are exactly the same, that they've probably worked out their story together. How much moreso if the events being questioned are from two years ago?

Besides, CNN said they interviewed "more than a half dozen" former classmates. Their articles only quote three of them. So that means -- if CNN is telling the truth about how many they inteviewed -- there are four people they interviewed (at least) whose stories CNN didn't think we should hear, for some strange reason. (Also, it's CNN, bro.)

[Michael]

Pierce Dalton a écrit :

Nargo a écrit :

Everyone who shatters your narrative is totally a paid agent bro :lunar2019crylaughingpig:

I don't have a narrative, but if someone is saying the opposite of all his other classmates... that's a bit sus to say the least. Also, it's FOX, bro :lunar2019crylaughingpig:

you can find more info on Rumble. youtube has been hiding a lot of things
I'm no fan of fox, but if you believe places like PMSNBC or cnn you might have problem with your news sources.

Just look at these videos.

https://youtu.be/OvpVj_8mA8A

https://youtu.be/SdCsTQv7K9g

https://youtu.be/m1EREbJGOII

https://youtu.be/8RBInjhZUPM

[Masque]

If only Rumble, and all the other YouTube alternatives, had a fairly usable inteface and search function, and YouTube didn't have a monopoly on forum embeds internet-wide.

That's the worst thing about Google. You can't post embeds from any other video site, pretty much anywhere online. Horrible monopolistic practice, and nobody stops it.

(I might have it wrong. Maybe all the other video sites are to small to be able to afford allowing that.)

[the grinch wetbandit]

kinda destroys their entire narrative, and lays the fact that the shooter was theirs.

[Masque]

"Theirs"

The shooter, who may have been Crooks, or may have been some other guy -- the dead shooter photos certainly look more like that Antifa guy with the ear gauges, Maxwell Yearick -- can only really be claimed by whoever got him all his equipment, trained him in explosive construction, bought his white van (even though he showed up in a car, and somehow also a bike), drones that he flew, planning in seven days, and scrubbing his house "medically clean" before investigators arrived.

I don't think his political ideology matters as much as who got him to do it. And it's most likely a three-letter agency or several. His ideology was "nutcase who can be convinced by government agencies to take out their arch-enemy".

[the grinch wetbandit]

Masque a écrit :

"Theirs"

The shooter, who may have been Crooks, or may have been some other guy -- the dead shooter photos certainly look more like that Antifa guy with the ear gauges, Maxwell Yearick -- can only really be claimed by whoever got him all his equipment, trained him in explosive construction, bought his white van (even though he showed up in a car, and somehow also a bike), drones that he flew, planning in seven days, and scrubbing his house "medically clean" before investigators arrived.

I don't think his political ideology matters as much as who got him to do it. And it's most likely a three-letter agency or several. His ideology was "nutcase who can be convinced by government agencies to take out their arch-enemy".

Yes, right, I read about the theory of the shooter being this Maxwell Yearick dude. But i thought the theory went something like it is being intentionally kept quiet as if everbody knew it was him the left would be exposed, as this guy was a huge far left terrorist, Antifa member and all. That would be the political ideology, wouldnt it? A thing i dont understand is if it was ear gauge 30sumthing Yearick, so whos Thomas Crooks and whose that photo of the scrawny dude passed around in the media? AI person?

[the grinch wetbandit]

I do agree that there was kind help and training given to the shooter, whether crooks or etc.

[Masque]

No idea. All I know is the photo of the dead guy, when lined up next to a mugshot of Yearick and a recent photo (not the 16-year old kid photo) of Crooks, looks exactly like Yearick and nothing like Crooks. Down to the closed-up gauge holes in his ears, and his mouth and eyebrows.

Regardless it doesn't matter because what matters is our government, most likely, tried to kill Trump that day. All that other talk about shooters and ideologies and classmates is just chaff and noise.

[Quillithe]

Masque a écrit :

.
Regardless it doesn't matter because what matters is our government, most likely, tried to kill Trump that day. All that other talk about shooters and ideologies and classmates is just chaff and noise.

You think it was a Russian assassination attempt? I dunno, seems like a stretch

[Reddit]

Xautos a écrit :

ahh yes, the reliable dailymail.. hah.

[Netaris]

The sniper team didn't engaged the shooter because a tree blocked their line of sight and it's probable that the other sniper team was the ones who killed him. Also, how do you climb a wall up to a roof as a cop, if there is a guy with an AR on top of it ready to shoot you ? While climbing you can't access your firearm, aim and shoot, you're a sitting duck.

The real question I have is : Why there was no cops on top on this roof ideally placed for an assassination attempt ?

More details for those interested : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7PdhHC2zr0

[THE LORD]

Did the leftist owned media outlets even report this?

Or are they still spinning the same old story that he was republican?