Trump shooter, Thomas Crooks, social media posts, not Republican

[joco]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673423/social-media-post-trump-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-ceo.html

"He posted on the site nine (9) times total... While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden."

[abcd]

his social media presence makes more sense for a bot honestly.

when's the last time you looked at 14,000 photos of guns in a single google images session? before settling on the AR-15 you already have.

[↑↑↓↓←→←→BASelect]

So Thomas the tank finally went crazy.

[Morkonan]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von joco:

Trump shooter, Thomas Crooks, social media posts, not Republican

He was a registered Republican.

Therefore "a Republican."

If we're talking about personal behavior and online social interactions being the defining traits for someone's political affiliation, instead, then many so-called "Republicans" are not actually conservatives or traditional "Republicans," but are Fascists and other, less savory, terms. But, we don't have any other powerful political parties dedicated to those ideals, so...

And, I used to be a "Republican." Now, I'm just a "Fiscal Conservative." What I am not, however, is a fascist, totalitarian, misogynistic, wacko. While that could be just about anyone of any political affiliation, those seem to gravitate to one side of the line these days. I don't know if there is a party-registration card for those sorts.

As far as the shooter, it appears he really just wanted his name in the history books. He was probably more inspired by the school's "Shooting Club" refusing him for unsafe practices and unskilled performance, or whatever. So, I guess maybe he decided to show them what he could do? Dunno, data is still unfolding.

[Xautos]

ahh yes, the reliable dailymail.. hah.

[Original Cast Recording]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von joco:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673423/social-media-post-trump-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-ceo.html

"He posted on the site nine (9) times total... While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden."

Investigators have found no threatening comments on social media accounts or ideological positions that could help explain what led him to target Trump

[abcd]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Maximum Disambiguation:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von joco:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673423/social-media-post-trump-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-ceo.html

"He posted on the site nine (9) times total... While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden."

Investigators have found no threatening comments on social media accounts or ideological positions that could help explain what led him to target Trump

bots don't have motivations for their searches, and a motiveless shooter raises fewer questions. especially when they're declared dead.

luckily there's no charges for anyone to press, so there's no need for habeus corpus.

[Original Cast Recording]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von abcd:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Maximum Disambiguation:

a motiveless shooter raises fewer questions

To anyone except OT users, it seems.

[abcd]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Maximum Disambiguation:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von abcd:

a motiveless shooter raises fewer questions

To anyone except OT users, it seems.

if he had a motive it would be easier to craft a narrative where he was real

[Quillithe]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Maximum Disambiguation:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von joco:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13673423/social-media-post-trump-shooter-thomas-matthew-crooks-ceo.html

"He posted on the site nine (9) times total... While the account made very few posts on the site, the majority of them were in support of President Biden."

Investigators have found no threatening comments on social media accounts or ideological positions that could help explain what led him to target Trump

You're missing the part where it's 'maybe' his account with no evidence given for why it would be.

[Original Cast Recording]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Quillithe:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Maximum Disambiguation:

You're missing the part where it's 'maybe' his account with no evidence given for why it would be.

Well, I wasn't going to post the entire article that OP may or may not have actually read.

[abcd]

nobody's given any hard evidence crookers even exists yet.

[Dracoco OwO]

Peoples forget one thing about the shooter, he apparently wanted to shoot Biden after Trump, i assume following his "logic" (just how the ♥♥♥♥ did he know he'd get away with killing either to then kill the second?) Trump was the better immediate target because he doesn't have the kind of protection Biden gets due to his current presidential status.

That being said he clearly was an idiot since he failed to kill Trump despite having the perfect line of sight and not being that far from Trump all things considered, a shot Trump was clearly lucky to survive but i blame the shooter mainly for sucking with a firearm, because at this point that's not bad luck that's incompetence.

[abcd]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dracoco OwO:

Peoples forget one thing about the shooter, he apparently wanted to shoot Biden after Trump, i assume following his "logic" (just how the ♥♥♥♥ did he know he'd get away with killing either to then kill the second?) Trump was the better immediate target because he doesn't have the kind of protection Biden gets due to his current presidential status.

That being said he clearly was an idiot since he failed to kill Trump despite having the perfect line of sight and not being that far from Trump all things considered, a shot Trump was clearly lucky to survive but i blame the shooter mainly for sucking with a firearm, because at this point that's not bad luck that's incompetence.

Police found him and were climbing up the roof I heard. So he was under pressure.

Kinda contradicts the other narratives though.

[Dracoco OwO]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von abcd:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dracoco OwO:

Peoples forget one thing about the shooter, he apparently wanted to shoot Biden after Trump, i assume following his "logic" (just how the ♥♥♥♥ did he know he'd get away with killing either to then kill the second?) Trump was the better immediate target because he doesn't have the kind of protection Biden gets due to his current presidential status.

That being said he clearly was an idiot since he failed to kill Trump despite having the perfect line of sight and not being that far from Trump all things considered, a shot Trump was clearly lucky to survive but i blame the shooter mainly for sucking with a firearm, because at this point that's not bad luck that's incompetence.

Police found him and were climbing up the roof I heard. So he was under pressure.

Kinda contradicts the other narratives though.

I mean he should have been caught by then, full stop, realistically they just let him try to kill Trump i don't believe anything else, everything about this situation is stupid and unrealistic.

Dude should have taken drugs at this point probably anyways.

[abcd]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Dracoco OwO:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von abcd:

Police found him and were climbing up the roof I heard. So he was under pressure.

Kinda contradicts the other narratives though.

I mean he should have been caught by then, full stop, realistically they just let him try to kill Trump i don't believe anything else, everything about this situation is stupid and unrealistic.

Dude should have taken drugs at this point probably anyways.

Well you see, the secret service has certain rules of engagement.

Except the snipers were 'police' and pointed right at him already.

Idk maybe they weren't actually police, or secret service. Maybe they were just actors.