安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I'm sensing a tone from you. That can get you into trouble. Just sayin'.
Thanks for the half story. Good luck with your anger issues.
Was it a sucker punch? Or did he hit you first?
I would thump you a half dozen ways, but okay. That said, I'm a lover not a fighter.
So, did you hit your bro? Or was it self defense?
You hit him first didn't you?
Look, we just want an actual factual story. Is that too much to ask? Maybe you're innocent - but we'll never know without the actual story. Heh.
Pretty sure you can be difficult to live with tho.
Well, actually, hiting first after signs of an incoming attack is a good idea (someone screaming at you, looking at you like some kind of predator, trying to touch you in inappropriate ways, pulling their pant up or removing glasses or any other fixing of clothing before an attack). What you really want is to hit first to gain the initiative, hard enough to destabilize the agressive guy and nicely enough to not injure him. You want it to look as ineffective and non-violent as possible, while giving a good, clear "don't try any further" message to the guy.
There is a balance to find about it, to avoid being attacked and also to avoid social consequences of defending yourself in a society full of naive moralists.
Okay. In certain situations. But in this situation, I would rather take the first hit, Netaris.
What should you actually do? Deescalate the situation. Look at OP. He feels bad about what happened.
Hasn't for me up until at least the last 20 years or so - now kids are stabbing each other as the norm these days.
To OP. I get what you are saying. I have never ever been an aggressive guy and have actively avoided aggression but I have been a victim of it.
I still look back at those times where my instinct was to fight back but my upbringing stopped me. It still hurts to be that guy
Deescalation is good for police officers with guns and reinforcement if deescalation attempts fail. I'm not a police officer, I don't have any right to carry guns here or even a pepper spray ... If I think someone will attack me and I don't know if the guy have some knife on him or something like that, I prefer to punch first.
Most attacks don't come from nowhere, you've already had a problem with the guy or he already searched conflict with you, trying to do some kind of "psychological warfare" on you first, trying to stress you, to test you, to take some advantage on you, etc. An attack is often an escalation and you can see it coming most of the time. If enough signs of an incoming attack are sended to me, I will not deescalate, I will use a well-knowed military tactic : escalate to deescalate. I hit just hard enough and wait and see. I don't know what this guy is capable of, but I can have trust in my own training and self-control. I know my best chance to deescalate, is to escalate just one time, hard enough to be a deterent.
I wish you to never cross path with that kind of peoples, but some peoples understand only the use of force. If you just try to talk they'll think you're weak and attack. Because that kind of violent idiots exist and you don't know who's the guy in front of you in most cases, you have to guess you're in the worst case scenario. At least that's how I see things.
I'll never punch someone unprovocked, but if someone search the fight with me, I will have no hesitation humbling him a bit.