Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
You're the monkey. And it is interesting cuz they know sh!t.
I enjoy magicians who are clearly communicating to the audience that they are "magicians."
I do NOT enjoy magicians who are continuing the charade of being a "magician" into the realm of magic, mystery, occult, special-powers, etc...
So, for instance, I don't like David Blaine. Sure, he's got some cool tricks, but... it's his presentation and the "just a bit too much" projection of "it's really "magic" and I am an occult weezard" personae.
As a result of his continuing to project that magical mastery of the arcane arts... he has a cult following of disturbed people that think he can really do "magic." No foolin', they think he has magical powers. :/
and as such i also enjoy the continuation of that experience, thinking about how certain tricks could be made, well after having witnessed them.
It's not magic, if anything it's as much of a parlor trick as Ouija boards and Hellen Keller.
GenX kids probably remember him from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nblpob8gyzs
Doc Savage and The Spider came first, but they were just regular people with training and gadgets like Batman.