Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
Both cattle food and soy boom cause deforestation and soil depletion. The "I'm morally better than you" don't work here.
Are you prone to conspiratorial thinking because I think it's rearing it's head.
Wow what's the matter? Someone stole your gluten free bread?
Stay mad for no reason I guess.
nuts and legumes ofcourse.
https://youtu.be/egBGU8rz5JY
You may want to look into getting a new lunch box
Again, the no true scotsman fallacy, but instead, the no true omnivore doesn't know that animals are treated badly in 5% of farms, so they are evil whether they like it or not. This also partially makes sense though, other than the selfish humans part.
You didn't call every human selfish just for enjoying meat this time, so I suppose it is progress. This makes sense though, morality fears as well.
And now we are back to square one with the all humans are selfish for enjoying meat fallacy. while it is sad that babies are killed, the animals killed our babies before we became a society that kicked the feral animals out of our city. So basically it is revenge at this point.
Other than the no true scotsman fallacy depicted in 3 out of 4 arguments, these do make sense. It's the reason why i buy from family farms, as even though it's more expensive, they do not mistreat animals.
If you don't eat meat because you don't like killing or eating live things, that's totally understandable. If you're vegan because it's better for the environment, you have been misled.
There's nothing wrong with being vegan, if people want to do that I say power to them.
However before people go brow beating others for not being vegan or whatever, know that being vegan is a luxury that only those in first world countries can experience (aka the top 1% richest in the world, as if your household makes 30k a year American - including money you get from welfare or get back in taxes if you are low income - you ARE part of the 1%).
If you forced those in third world countries to become vegan, you would kill millions if not billions of people from starvation.
At the same time, if you're a non vegan, please don't be a ♥♥♥♥ and brow Beat or make fun of vegans. All you're doing is giving in to the division and taking the chance of a productive conversation off the table completely.
Eggs and milk are overproduced, lactose intolerant, find cracking and cleaning up after them annoying, but I do like milk bread.
And I believe there are potential forms of milk and egg production which don’t harm the animals and can at least bring them up to par with the average one-armed child laborer in a sweat shop of unmentionable nature.
But economic reform is a different subject.
murdering them is not mistreating them?
stock animals have no rights so it cannot be murder.
I don't exactly think empathy and intellectual things come into play here, since intellectual people eat meat as well.
Well known fact!
Are Peppa Pig books vegans?