Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You sure his name is not Phoenix?
All I got out of your response is that the truth hurts.
Then let me expand that response:
Can a video game character touch me?
Can I be her lap pillow and she mine?
Can I offer her home-made pastries?
Can I take out to a romantic date?
I know that the answer to that question is NO. But anyone making a disparaging statement like you did seems to forget that. If a female is insecure and jealous because of a string of 1s and 0s on a plate with microchips and circuits, that's HER problem.
Same goes for many other games where most characters were made out of a few pixels.
Right wingers are getting desperate and need something new to campaign on, so now it’s ‘woke’. Tomorrow they’ll make up new problems to split the society for their own gains of power.
If only good-LOOKING characters sell games, how did Mario games remain top-sellers for 40 years?
Can a video game character touch me?
Can I be her lap pillow and she mine?
Can I offer her home-made pastries?
Can I take out to a romantic date?
I know that the answer to that question is NO. But are you sure you know it?
I'm pretty sure a female android would be more pleasant company than a generalizing female who looks down on people.
And there's your answer. It's not just looks that make someone desired.
Nobody plays a game just because they find a character attractive. (Well, maybe a few do, but they're anomalous.)
Attractive characters though are a factor. A good game is still a good game if the characters aren't attractive, but a good game with attractive characters is better than one without.
And perhaps you've forgotten the craze behind Lara Croft. She was only made up of a few polygons, yes, but she was attractive, or at least as attractive as PS1 graphics could make her.
Then in all the official art, they created her with a certain amount of sex appeal. They advertised her with sex appeal. There was a whole ad campaign for TR2 suggesting "the boys" weren't at their usual spots at the bar, or the ball game, or the strip clubs because they were all at home playing Tomb Raider.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxG3henG1KA
She was the first virtual character to be featured as a centerfold in Playboy magazine, August 1999.
In the movie, they cast Angelina Jolie, a very attractive woman, for the role of Lara. They did this for a reason.
So I agree. Nobody really plays games only because they find a character attractive. But it is a factor.