Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
harder to define too for well whats an english? is it a briton? an anglo-saxon? an norman?
so instead we tested for the tribal groups once settles...
(by taking their remains and test and use that as a base)
can only do large groups.. so testing for something like batavians is not possible due too small a sample sice.. even though dutch likely decend from tham)
well than my genome :
frisians : 70.2%
saxon : 27.6%
norse : 1.2%
frankish : 0,5%
anglic : 0.2%
danish : 0.1%
sami : 0.1%
other : 0.1%
mostly nothing surpriosing here with the above numbers.. with frisians having strong contact with norse and danish.. some inmixture is to be expected.,. anglians are strongly related to frisians.. and used us as a stop on the way there so no surprise there..
I was surprised by the low percentage of frankish blood... given how often france has occupied our nation and that frisia magna was conquered by franks.. and a lot of my family having migrated to brabant after the destruction of dorestad.. and lived there for hundreds hundreds of year in the same village.. and brabant was often occupied by friensh.. ou'd expect them to have mixed in with locals with more frankish genes..
-
saxon genes is to be expected.. as I also decend from german nobility.. I could call myself a freiherr if I wanted... (going back to the early 13th century)
so they did not really test for any ancestors more recent than 500 years ago..
but yeah as nations did excist back than they did went 1 step further....
**they opened graves of people died in cuirrent nations borders 500 years ago
**they made sure to do so over a large area of such nation to level out regional differences
**they tested them and so formed basicly the mixture each nation should have...
it does not give as preciece a national herritige but more roughly a regional herritage
here is my outcome :
**the below regions were made geografical by fysical boundries. rivers, mounters.. coasts
western european : 100%
britisch islanands : 0%
irish island : 0%
scandinavia upper (artic line) : 0%
scandivavia lower : 0.3%
lowlands (which they defined as inside the rivers) so not all of belgium but a chunk of germany too : 97.7%
germany : 3.0% (again geograficly defined)
france (again geografic so parts of belgium and north iraly included) : 0%
-Central european : 0%
-
(the other regions would fall under central or middle europe so
so well pretty much YUP I am as pure dutch as you can get.. most dutch have like 6-12% french inmixing.. and even a 1-2% iberian inmixing I don't have.
I can tell you for a fact that absolutely no-one on this forum read through that absolute drivel.
thats their loss..
suffice to say when I know I am more dutch than even most dutch.. I know what i talk about.
this is my land.., it has belonged to my ancestors for over 30000 years...
and I not want no migrants taking it.
I like genetics, yes, nothing wrong with that.
That, is in fact, eugenics.
He talks like this about every subject, not just genetics.
I assume you are a Finnish liberal, hence you are not showing your country on your Steam profile and get overly obsessed over me writing Finnland with two N instead of one N. Which in my eyes is pretty ridiculous and irrelevant in this context.
I don't want to move to the U.S. lol and you are not in the position to tell me where to move anyway.
Also for a Finn you seem pretty badly informed about your own country, YES while you are right that not MOST people in FiNNland possess a gun, it is factual that a large quantity of the Finnish people possess a gun and pretty much every Finn has at least access to it !
Here you go Mr. Peaceful :"
In Finland, it is estimated that there are around 32 firearms per 100 residents. This places Finland among the countries with the highest rates of gun ownership globally. Approximately 20% of Finnish households possess at least one firearm, reflecting a significant level of civilian gun ownership in the country
"
Source: OSF
How delusinal are you?
I never did bring genetics into this, Dutchgamer got all obsessed over genetics. Maybe read before you start trolling.
I mean, he describes himself as a nationalist, a racist (but one of the "good ones", who don't want to commit genocide...) and has proudly claimed, that he has beaten up migrants (which he claims was in self-defence, of course). What else does there need to be said.
I abide by their laws, but last time I checked Finland is a democracy and people are allowed to disagree and criticise things.
You assume wrong. I'm conservative, but that does not automatically mean I want you to have a gun. Also I show my country on my Steam profile and what the hell does me correcting you have to do with being a liberal?
You ain't getting a gun, deal with it or move someplace else.
There's 460,000 people with a gun license in Finland, including cops. That's not most people. Try harder.
Source: ministry of the interior.