Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
https://corespirit.com/articles/scientists-admit-everything-they-know-about-physics-is-likely-wrong
I'll entertain this despite it being a silly turdpost. A "flat 3D space" still perfectly supports three-dimensional bodies. Curvature of 3D space is a support for general relativity and measuring the size of the universe. It does not say "stellar bodies need to be pancakes". Curiously though the universe has in fact been measured to be just as flat as the cartesian 3D space we use in game engines, though whether we lack the resolution to truly map it out remains (and will eternally remain) unanswered.
Gravity indisputably exists and the relevant question is whether it's a force or an emergent property, which is where GR and quantum mechanics start to clash. Science aside though, it makes little sense to exclude gravity in particular as "non existant because it's code" when you're proposing that everything is a simulation: if everything is code then ostensibly nothing "exists", therefore pointing at specifically psuedogravity as the key to supporting your theory is nonsense.
:-P
- Anime avatar.
- Trying to sound intelligent.
It's only a theory, lighten up.
I'll even add this as suggested reading: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structure-scientific-theories/
Damn you give up that easily huh
Wait, you are talking about Flat Earthers then go on to use a completely different conspiracy theory to explain how Flat Earth makes sense?
It doesn't matter whether this is a simulation or not, we can make observations and measurements to prove that the word is spherical. The flat earth theory just doesn't stand up.
And we can even measure gravity so accurately, that we can disprove any of the flat-earthers theories. For example, the flat earth accelerating upwards. If it was that, then gravity would be uniform over the earths surface, and it's not.
I think you have to ask yourself why would anyone lie about the shape of the earth? And how could those people keep it a secret? I mean there are millions of amateur astronomers in the world, and you suppose they are ALL lying? What about all the sailors who have gone round the world. They are lying too? And the pilots. And the astronauts. That's a lot of people lying.
Hey look, it's the guy who tried to claim that not endorsing LGTV is the same as saying that people don't have a mind.