Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_map
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%E2%80%93Szekeres_coordinates
Do yourself a favor and subscribe to real space education channels like Isaac Arthur or Dr. Becky
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Arthur
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Becky_Smethurst
Including the creation of three dimensional space and time along with gravity and the electromagnetic spectrum.
It's really beautiful how simple and logical it all is. I'll explain after I publish.
dont exclude black hole have their own universe or than we are inside universe black hole
Even the highest rated comment is calling out the video for clickbait.
What did Stephen Hawkin say about 3 dimensions when talking of viewing the universe in his book Brief history of time?
I'll add its quite something if there was a being who thought lets make a multi dimensional thing.
I have often thought maybe we were created to become stronger and more intelligent in how the fabrics of existence works as we might one day be part of fixing the fabrics or things going wrong within the universe, we have a long way to go to get there countless changes and evolution to our genetics beyond what we can fathom now.
My own answer to "why" is my own.
But, yes, I do believe in a sort of "Big Bang Theory" in that it's a very good explanation for "how."
No, I am not a "follower" of it and there is no evidence that it is a valid theory.
A really good video about the pop-sci/culture surrounding "String Theory:"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kya_LXa_y1E
With a proposal that has no means of testing, measurement, or observation... Uh... /shrug
I do not believe in the pop-sci version of "Multiverse Theory." I also think that many of what some people attribute to it may actually be evidence of something else or flawed foundations. (Note: Given infinite time in an infinite universe, and if we are "right" about Natural Law, that which is not forbidden is compulsory. IOW - Someone that measures up to be an exact duplicate of you must exist... at some time, in some place. (A pop-sci topic, to be sure))
Sock Gremlins exist and their favorite environments are laundry rooms. My collection of single socks with missing mates grows...
/thread
No
No
----------
Despite their common monikers, neither String nor Multiverse are actually theories (they are instead simply hypotheses). Quantum Field and General Relativity are really the only actual theories we have in these regards.
No proof or evidence for any of this speculation. We assume a lot of things for fact, the only way we can know about anything in space is by going out there and exploring to find out, collecting hard facts and proof to help our understanding and to shape it in ways we can't possibly predict or understand.