what's your opinion on websites requiring ID to sign up?

[caltrop77]

like photo id

[DoomsDay]

I dont know what kinds of contract I have agreed to when browsing porn site. others I dont very much know, never read users agreement.

some people has work-around for there one sided user agreement, most people dont.
and yeah, the agreement one person accidently signed, can affect his life greatly. it can affect everything.

the thing one person read about, the group he keep in contact with, all means things for people.

I can only hope, people know what they sign up for, and get profit instead of hurt.

[bluesky66621]

Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter already using ID as verification. It's a matter of time that all social media websites will be like this.

[bluesky66621]

Originally posted by AD:

I don't ever give my id to websites like that. Facebook, for example, will store a copy of the id if I remember correctly, which means the id would be one data breach away from falling into the wrong hands. Plus why would facebook need it in the first place? It's really shady

No, it's a security measure. Facebook isn't the only social media websites that do this. Even though Facebook was the first to do it.

[Pierce Dalton]

What? I've never seen that in any website.

[D. Flame]

Should be illegal until internet security breaches are a thing of the past.

[Caldari Ghost]

my opinion is i will go to other websites

[Pierce Dalton]

Originally posted by D. Flame:

Should be illegal until internet security breaches are a thing of the past.

It doesn't really matter tbh. Have you ever purchased something online? They do have all your data and probably sold it by now.

[AD]

Originally posted by bluesky66621:

Originally posted by AD:

I don't ever give my id to websites like that. Facebook, for example, will store a copy of the id if I remember correctly, which means the id would be one data breach away from falling into the wrong hands. Plus why would facebook need it in the first place? It's really shady

No, it's a security measure. Facebook isn't the only social media websites that do this. Even though Facebook was the first to do it.

Considering it's facebook and Zuck we are talking about, it's definately shady. Two things can be true at once, it can have a security aspect while still being shady since these companies likes to track people (also it's not that we are important, we aren't, they just get money from directed advertisements and stuff, and the more data they have the better they can direct said advertisement).

Also it's one data breach away from going from security to a massive security issue.

[shoopy]

Identity theft just got worse.

[ZZZZZ]

do they actually exist?

[Zilkenian Davenport]

Invasion of privacy, will probably sell it to third parties.
No thank you.

[D. Flame]

Originally posted by Pierce Dalton:

Originally posted by D. Flame:

Should be illegal until internet security breaches are a thing of the past.

It doesn't really matter tbh. Have you ever purchased something online? They do have all your data and probably sold it by now.

Homes get broken into all the time, does that mean you should leave your front door unlocked and standing wide open?

[shoopy]

Originally posted by ZZZZZ:

do they actually exist?

Not yet but only because certain sites have blocked the multiple states that have passed laws requiring it.

[Acetyl]

Never heard of it.

[Acetyl]

Originally posted by AustrAlien2010:

Can you not let the A.I. make a portrait of a non-existing human and use that?

That's probably been going on for at least 20 years now. Only recently has consumer grade means of faking it in realtime for stuff like livestreaming, become available.