Refugees Sent to Rwanda

[ハイイロギツネ]

Officers in the UK have raided the homes of the first people to be deported to Rwanda.

Women seized in immigration raids ahead of Rwanda deportation flights

How do you guys feel about sending war refugees to Africa?

[ZZZZZ]

its a fat win for the chosen refugees, they get an own house and a bucket full of money.. its like a paid vacation

[permanent name]

how much money did this save the british government, given the likely costs of suppressing dissidents, news about the camp's failure, and pending lawsuits of all kinds?

not to mention the expense of giving them the bucket in the first place.

how many private charities are getting write-offs for deporting people they promised to protect?

[ZZZZZ]

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

how much money did this save the british government, given the likely costs of suppressing dissidents, news about the camp's failure, and pending lawsuits of all kinds?

not to mention the expense of giving them the bucket in the first place.

how many private charities are getting write-offs for deporting people they promised to protect?

it costs aroun 500k-1million per refugee, it never was intented to save money

[permanent name]

Originalmente postado por ZZZZZ:

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

how much money did this save the british government, given the likely costs of suppressing dissidents, news about the camp's failure, and pending lawsuits of all kinds?

not to mention the expense of giving them the bucket in the first place.

how many private charities are getting write-offs for deporting people they promised to protect?

it costs aroun 500k-1million per refugee, it never was intented to save money

source?

[ZZZZZ]

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

Originalmente postado por ZZZZZ:

it costs aroun 500k-1million per refugee, it never was intented to save money

source?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rwanda-plan-uk-asylum-seeker-cost-figures
the 500-1million is long term cost tho, currently its higher since they build the houses and infrastructure from scratch

[Triple G]

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

source?

Statista says 2 millions per refugee, while the costs were 12k per year here in Germany.

It´s not that the UK is the only country which wants to fly refugees directly into other countries, to have all the bureaucracy done there, while they´re out of sight - so the people wouldn´t complain about immigration and see that something is done. While Germany / the EU wants to expand the idea to North Africa and other countries...

It´s then the called the "Rwanda model", as it´s done similarly to it and picks up the idea. Human rights / international agreements? Doesn´t matter. I mean it should be obvious that these countries don´t do it out of pure charity...

[permanent name]

Originalmente postado por Triple G:

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

source?

Statista says 2 millions per refugee, while the costs were 12k per year here in Germany.

It´s not that the UK is the only country which wants to fly refugees directly into other countries, to have all the bureaucracy done there, while they´re out of sight - so the people wouldn´t complain about immigration and see that something is done. While Germany / the EU wants to expand the idea to North Africa and other countries...

It´s then the called the "Rwanda model", as it´s done similarly to it and picks up the idea. Human rights / international agreements? Doesn´t matter. I mean it should be obvious that these countries don´t do it out of pure charity...

you odn't think maybe britain land of banking fraud maybe manipulated the prices upwards a little?

maybe has an infalted economy that charged 100,000 euro per bucket and 300,000 per plane ticket?

[permanent name]

Originalmente postado por ZZZZZ:

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

source?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rwanda-plan-uk-asylum-seeker-cost-figures
the 500-1million is long term cost tho, currently its higher since they build the houses and infrastructure from scratch

well the developers need their millions I guess.

does each person get an apartment complex?

what's the lease agreement right?

any HOA fees?

[Vox]

People that come here via illegal means should be deported.

[ZZZZZ]

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

Originalmente postado por ZZZZZ:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/01/rwanda-plan-uk-asylum-seeker-cost-figures
the 500-1million is long term cost tho, currently its higher since they build the houses and infrastructure from scratch

well the developers need their millions I guess.

does each person get an apartment complex?

what's the lease agreement right?

any HOA fees?

the buildings are supposed to be owned and provided by the local government, they get paid through the deal in the link

if u mean for fees for the refugees- u dont have any fees as refugee, as said, its like a holiday resort with 6-24month paid vacation, everyone gets their own place and money on top of it

in theory its a super sweet deal and the only drawback is the very limited amount of people they accept

[Heitor Villa-Lobos]

Originalmente postado por Vox:

People that come here via illegal means should be deported.

Yet here I am speaking a language I despise against my will.

Neocolonization and xenophobia go hand in hand. Its your kind that should be illegal everywhere.

[Triple G]

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

maybe has an infalted economy that charged 100,000 euro per bucket and 300,000 per plane ticket?

All that doesn´t matter too much if it´s about costs for the society. If You have refugees, and give them money, they will spend most of that money in the country, so it comes back to the society. If You give that money to another country - it´s gone for the society. But in a way perhaps the best method of third world aid Europeans have ever came up with. Culprit: i don´t think they create jobs for the people, because it´s most likely not about a thought through method long term, but one which solves things fast and for the moment. Like always. While of course certain people make good money with it. The consultants, certain companies, and certain decision makers.

[Rio]

They paid them to come, and now they send them somewhere to die.

[permanent name]

Originalmente postado por ZZZZZ:

Originalmente postado por permanent name:

well the developers need their millions I guess.

does each person get an apartment complex?

what's the lease agreement right?

any HOA fees?

the buildings are supposed to be owned and provided by the local government, they get paid through the deal in the link

if u mean for fees for the refugees- u dont have any fees as refugee, as said, its like a holiday resort with 6-24month paid vacation, everyone gets their own place and money on top of it

in theory its a super sweet deal and the only drawback is the very limited amount of people they accept

okay so just gonna drop a weee billion on your government; don't owe us nothin for this now do ya!

it's at ererible deal and they limited the pool to cut costs on their development scam.

[Scally]

The western world is far too tolerant of people who are in a country illegally. Most of them do not have a case for asylum. Human rights convention is no longer fit for purpose, it is outdated. What was happening 100 years ago is irrelevant.

Neighbouring, EU countries are rightfully worried about UK getting tough on it because it will encourage more immigrants to stay in mainland Europe or head for the Republic of Ireland, the latter being so naïve as to think that they can send immigrants back to the UK just by changing their own laws (of course France doesn't allow the UK to send back Channel crossings).

Having said all this, it won't matter because Labour have said they will scrap the Rwanda policy and are going to win the next general election. I have absolutely no idea what they plan to do instead.