安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
"anyone with critical thinking" ... knows that folk are to be considered innocent until proven guilty until all chances to appeal a criminal charge or questionable conviction.
To me he is innocent until convicted by the highest court and even then still potentially innocent if he is a suspected attempt of "railroading" him for reasons to appeal to a "socialist" agenda of political correctness.
It's inhumane to paint anyone as guilty, especially by the legacy media or "courts of public opinion"
And it's not like Andrew Tate has been a private person with his life.
And even if he is found innocent, it's not like he's exactly doing things morally.
Not to use the obvious "but what about this" but, OJ Simpson was found innocent and he's obviously not. Bill Cosby is also out roaming the streets.
It isn't inhumane to paint a sex trafficker as a sex trafficker. Especially with his own words and text messages.
But again, critical thinking helps know about all of that pesky evidence which has been verified.
remember when he is (or was???) a muslim? idk what happened after that tho
Those few months where he exploded in popularity were annoying.
I watched a few of his spars way before he became a "bugatti misogynist meme" and he fights well, but he's still a clown. Also, why would you willingly become a muslim and then act like this, it's just wierd.
Imagine how folk would feel if the evidence against him turns out to have been fabricated?
Makes it even funnier when he's literally used the evidence submitted(after cropping it) to try and prove his innocence on Twitter. Further verifying it's legitimacy.
Can't really be impartial to admitting the submitted evidence is legit.