What's Your Opinion of Andrew Tate?

[Nekoborg]

What's your opinion of Andrew Tate?

[Funky Monk]

Andrew Tit, the Bottom G

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Crusader (Banned6x):

I don't know...

Not sure about prison in Romania or the UK, but in the US prisoners hate celebs and they're huge targets because inmates have something to prove trying to be the guy who takes the big name down . If he's not put into a lower-level population or protective custody he could be in real trouble.

He knows how to fight and most likely enjoys hurting others who think they can take him on.

He is trained and has experience in how to read body language of how someone is going to attack just by how they move or stand, like which arm or leg/foot will be used and at what angle the attack will come.

He can probably hold his own against several enemies who lack his training and expertise.

He will probably enjoy the chance of a "workout"; especially if it earns him rank with prison gangs.

He will most likely strike first, second, third, fourth, fifth and so on until the enemy ls either injured or killed.

The finger prints on the enemies weapon(s) will prove he was a selected target for a premeditated attempted murder.

It would not surprise me if he earns money for any books he writes about life as a convict Nor would it surprise me if he gets special privileges from those screws (guards) who are of questionable character because they help the gangs run the prison.

This reads like an erotic fan-fic about Trafficking Tate.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von SlowMango:

This reads like an erotic fan-fic about Trafficking Tate.

I'm sure it does to some folk :steamlaughcry:

As in, anyone with critical thinking.

[Nekoborg]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von SlowMango:

As in, anyone with critical thinking.

"anyone with critical thinking" ... knows that folk are to be considered innocent until proven guilty until all chances to appeal a criminal charge or questionable conviction.

To me he is innocent until convicted by the highest court and even then still potentially innocent if he is a suspected attempt of "railroading" him for reasons to appeal to a "socialist" agenda of political correctness.

It's inhumane to paint anyone as guilty, especially by the legacy media or "courts of public opinion"

[Raelic]

Innocent until Proven guilty is just for people to be a fair jury or for people not to be vigilante. It's perfectly fine for people to judge and even change opinions as more information is released even before trials.

And it's not like Andrew Tate has been a private person with his life.

And even if he is found innocent, it's not like he's exactly doing things morally.

Not to use the obvious "but what about this" but, OJ Simpson was found innocent and he's obviously not. Bill Cosby is also out roaming the streets.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von SlowMango:

As in, anyone with critical thinking.

"anyone with critical thinking" ... knows that folk are to be considered innocent until proven guilty until all chances to appeal a criminal charge or questionable conviction.

To me he is innocent until convicted by the highest court and even then still potentially innocent if he is a suspected attempt of "railroading" him for reasons to appeal to a "socialist" agenda of political correctness.

It's inhumane to paint anyone as guilty, especially by the legacy media or "courts of public opinion"

It is still a good thing that folk are allowed to voice their opinion and even if you disagree with how I view the world and of opposite political alignment as me then I still value your opinion on this specific case of Andrew Tate.

You just admitted you don't even follow the guidelines for critical thinking by literally saying he's still innocent even after being convicted.

It isn't inhumane to paint a sex trafficker as a sex trafficker. Especially with his own words and text messages.

But again, critical thinking helps know about all of that pesky evidence which has been verified.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von SlowMango:

You just admitted you don't even follow the guidelines for critical thinking by literally saying he's still innocent even after being convicted.

It isn't inhumane to paint a sex trafficker as a sex trafficker. Especially with his own words and text messages.

But again, critical thinking helps know about all of that pesky evidence which has been verified.

Thank you for your opinion and input to this thread. I wish you a wonderful day.

Too bad it isn't an opinion. Unless we want to call evidence opinions now.

[BigBallinChester]

YOU CAN'T THROW ANDREW TATER IN JAIL. HE'S A TOP G

[sleeps]

funny guy all around.

remember when he is (or was???) a muslim? idk what happened after that tho

[AerSilver ♞]

My opinion is that I'm glad I don't have to hear about him anymore.
Those few months where he exploded in popularity were annoying.

I watched a few of his spars way before he became a "bugatti misogynist meme" and he fights well, but he's still a clown. Also, why would you willingly become a muslim and then act like this, it's just wierd.

[Nekoborg]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pipe:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von SlowMango:

You mean the sex trafficker?

I thought it turned out he was innocent?

Imagine how folk would feel if the evidence against him turns out to have been fabricated?

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pipe:

I thought it turned out he was innocent?

Imagine how folk would feel if the evidence against him turns out to have been fabricated?

Considering the evidence has already been accepted as not fabricated(that's literally part of the process before trial), unless his lawyers can time travel, it ain't happening.

Makes it even funnier when he's literally used the evidence submitted(after cropping it) to try and prove his innocence on Twitter. Further verifying it's legitimacy.

[Nekoborg]

It becomes increasingly difficult to find an impartial jury for obvious reasons.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Nekoborg:

It becomes increasingly difficult to find an impartial jury for obvious reasons.

Not every trial goes to a jury.

Can't really be impartial to admitting the submitted evidence is legit.

[Jonathan Sensei]

I'm going to be polite and just say I have a very low opinion of him.