安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
and surprisingly alot of antisocial and messed up dog ownsers dont educate them in the right way. and they simply cant, bec. they havent had any education themselves whatsoever, but they think its cool to have a powerful animal or weapon.
btw if i could, i would own a honeybadger just to piss off all the other dog ownwers, but jeah. . . i guess the honeybadger would show dominance and after a few days i would be his pet >.<*
reminds me at these wannabe-smart families, who think its a good idea to have a chimpanzee as pet. . . well, all i can say is its not and it never ends well lol.
In the UK, we seen to go through stages on which dogs are the most dangerous this decade... in the 70's it was the Doberman, in the 80's it was the Rottweiler, in the 90's it was the pitbull, now it seems to the bully XL dogs... god knows what dangerous dog will come next.
Anyway, all dogs can turn at any time but some owners don't deserve to own pets period.
I don't. The dogs I suspect are fine if they are treated properly from birth.
It's the knuckeledraggers that I'd 'sort out' before any dog killing started.
this became such a hot topic on FARK during the 2030s that nature vs nurture became a false dichotomy deeply embedded in god's childlike mind. as intangible and irremovable as bunbot hiding eggs from itself and not seeing why.
Are you a bot or this AI thing because your post is irrelevant and nonsense.
Can'y to god-botherers stop for a bit?
turn off the botnet.
Some bad owners just abuse that family protection and therefore the breed is stereotyped as being dangerous... when a Pitbull could even babysit and be extremely gentle with a baby.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMagxRyrvIs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22ARHeQR8XU
the issue was that the rumor persist for so long and was such a focal point for nazi propaganda that actual visible pop science got involved, and the explanation of societal dysfunction stemming directly from raising children to be bloodthirsty sociopaths in order to justify a world order that didn't work was becoming highly visible and well-accepted.
the failure in the propaganda war is a big part of what caused the fascist powers to create the fake aliens ww3 was fought against.
So they have a higher tendency to bite, tenaciously hold on, then shake, rather than let go. Leading to higher cases of injury and even death.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100808/
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/dog-attack-statistics-breed/
Edit: because you know there's "average Pitbull owner" and then there's "average Labrador owner" and for some reason the latter type of owner doesn't cause as many dog attacks. Perhaps because some of them are blind and the dogs are guide dogs. Anyways,